Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35981270›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Excision, and Observation for Early Rectal Cancer: The Phase II NEO Trial (CCTG CO.28) Primary End Point Results.

Hagen F Kennecke, Chris J O'Callaghan, Jonathan M Loree, Hussein Moloo, Rebecca Auer, Derek J Jonker, Manoj Raval, Reilly Musselman, Grace Ma, Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03259035 (NEO), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03259035 phase2completednot on this map

NEO: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Excision and Observation for Early Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCanadian Cancer Trials GroupRan2018 to 2024Enrolled58ConditionsRectal CancerArmsFolfox Protocol, Capox
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Organ preservation with total neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage rectal cancer: A statewide analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Local excision for T1 rectal cancer: A population-based study of practice patterns and oncological outcomes.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Hagen F KenneckeProvidence Cancer Institute and Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-0656
Chris J O'CallaghanCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Jonathan M LoreeBC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8189-2132
Hussein MolooThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9152-0014
Rebecca AuerThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3617-0015
Derek J JonkerThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Manoj RavalProvidence-St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9628-747X
Reilly MusselmanThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Grace MaHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8704-5935
Antonio Caycedo-MarulandaHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2387-5304
Vlad V SimianuVirginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA.
Sunil PatelCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Lacey D PitreJuravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7583-7804
Ramzi HelewaUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Vallerie L GordonCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Katerina NeumannNova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Halla NimeiriFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.
Max SherryCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Dongsheng TuCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-2184
Carl J BrownProvidence-St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-3541
Ottawa Hospital · CAQueen's University · CAHealth Sciences North · CASt. Paul's Hospital · CACancerCare Manitoba · CAFoundation Medicine (United States)Juravinski Cancer Centre · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CAProvidence Portland Medical Center · USUniversity of Manitoba · CAVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOrgan-sparing therapy for early-stage I/IIA rectal cancer is intended to avoid functional disturbances or a permanent ostomy associated with total mesorectal excision (TME). The objective of this phase II trial was to determine the outcomes and organ-sparing rate of patients with early-stage rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by transanal excision surgery (TES).

methodsThis phase II trial included patients with clinical T1-T3abN0 low- or mid-rectal adenocarcinoma eligible for endoscopic resection who were treated with 3 months of chemotherapy (modified folinic acid-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin 6 or capecitabine-oxaliplatin). Those with evidence of response proceeded to transanal endoscopic surgery 2-6 weeks later. The primary end point was protocol-specified organ preservation rate, defined as the proportion of patients with tumor downstaging to ypT0/T1N0/X and who avoided radical surgery.

resultsOf 58 patients enrolled, all commenced chemotherapy and 56 proceeded to surgery. A total of 33/58 patients had tumor downstaging to ypT0/1N0/X on the surgery specimen, resulting in an intention-to-treat protocol-specified organ preservation rate of 57% (90% CI, 45 to 68). Of 23 remaining patients recommended for TME surgery on the basis of protocol requirements, 13 declined and elected to proceed directly to observation resulting in 79% (90% CI, 69 to 88) achieving organ preservation. The remaining 10/23 patients proceeded to recommended TME of whom seven had no histopathologic residual disease. The 1-year and 2-year locoregional relapse-free survival was, respectively, 98% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 90% (95% CI, 58 to 98), and there were no distant recurrences or deaths. Minimal change in quality of life and rectal function scores was observed.

conclusionThree months of induction chemotherapy may successfully downstage a significant proportion of patients with early-stage rectal cancer, allowing well-tolerated organ-preserving surgery.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOxaliplatinQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID35981270
PMCPMC9839227
OpenAlexW4292228059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.