Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35981245›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2022

Detecting Colorectal Adenomas and Cancer Using Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath: A Proof-of-Principle Study to Improve Screening.

Hao Ran Cheng, Robert W R van Vorstenbosch, Daniëlle M Pachen, Lonne W T Meulen, Jan Willem A Straathof, Jan W Dallinga, Daisy M A E Jonkers, Ad A M Masclee, Frederik-Jan van Schooten, Zlatan Mujagic and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hao Ran ChengDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3474-1512
Robert W R van VorstenboschNUTRIM, School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Daniëlle M PachenNUTRIM, School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Lonne W T MeulenDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jan Willem A StraathofDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jan W DallingaNUTRIM, School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Daisy M A E JonkersDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ad A M MascleeDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Frederik-Jan van SchootenNUTRIM, School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Zlatan MujagicDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Agnieszka SmolinskaNUTRIM, School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1412-4544
Maastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) by screening programs is crucial because survival rates worsen at advanced stages. However, the currently used screening method, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), suffers from a high number of false-positives and is insensitive for detecting advanced adenomas (AAs), resulting in false-negatives for these premalignant lesions. Therefore, more accurate, noninvasive screening tools are needed. In this study, the utility of analyzing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath in a FIT-positive population to detect the presence of colorectal neoplasia was studied.

methodsIn this multicenter prospective study, breath samples were collected from 382 FIT-positive patients with subsequent colonoscopy participating in the national Dutch bowel screening program (n = 84 negative controls, n = 130 non-AAs, n = 138 AAs, and n = 30 CRCs). Precolonoscopy exhaled VOCs were analyzed using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the data were preprocessed and analyzed using machine learning techniques.

resultsUsing 10 discriminatory VOCs, AAs could be distinguished from negative controls with a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 70%, respectively. Based on this biomarker profile, CRC and AA combined could be discriminated from controls with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 70%, respectively, and CRC alone could be discriminated from controls with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 70%, respectively. Moreover, the feasibility to discriminate non-AAs from controls and AAs was shown. DISCUSSION: VOCs in exhaled breath can detect the presence of AAs and CRC in a CRC screening population and may improve CRC screening in the future.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsEarly Detection of CancerHumansProspective StudiesVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID35981245
PMCPMC10476860
OpenAlexW4293805294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.