Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980955›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

How do Yolŋu recognise and understand their children's learning? Nhaltjan ŋuli ga Yolŋuy nhäma ga märr-dharaŋan djamarrkuḻiw marŋgithinyawuy?

Emily Armstrong, Ḻäwurrpa Maypilama, Lyn Fasoli, Abbey Guyula, Megan Yunupiŋu, Jane Garrutju, Rosemary Gundjarranbuy, Dorothy Gapany, Jenine Godwin-Thompson, Anne Lowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Attachment and the (mis)apprehension of Aboriginal children: epistemic violence in child welfare interventions.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. A Holistic Approach to Early Relational Health: Cultivating Culture, Diversity, and Equity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily ArmstrongNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0485-1024
Ḻäwurrpa MaypilamaNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Lyn FasoliNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Abbey GuyulaNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Megan YunupiŋuNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Jane GarrutjuYalu Marŋgithinyaraw Indigenous Corporation, Galiwin'ku, Elcho Island, Northern Territory, Australia.
Rosemary GundjarranbuyYalu Marŋgithinyaraw Indigenous Corporation, Galiwin'ku, Elcho Island, Northern Territory, Australia.
Dorothy GapanyNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Jenine Godwin-ThompsonSNAICC-National Voice for our Children, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
Anne LowellNorthern Institute, College of Indigenous Futures, Education and the Arts, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous families have culturally-specific strengths, priorities, and methods for assessing their children's development. Recognition and support of children's and families' strengths are important for identity, health and wellbeing. However, strengths can be missed in assessment processes developed in non-Indigenous contexts. Yolŋu are First Nations Australian peoples from North-East Arnhem Land. This study was conducted to explore Yolŋu early childhood development, assessment and support in response to concerns that Yolŋu strengths and priorities are often not recognised. The cultural and linguistic expertise of Yolŋu researchers was central in this qualitative study. Rich empirical data were collected through a form of video reflexive ethnography with six children and their extended families over seven years and through in-depth interviews with 38 other community members. An iterative process of data collection and analysis engaged Yolŋu families and researchers in a collaborative, culturally responsive research process which drew on constructivist grounded theory methods. Findings illustrate how Yolŋu children are immersed in complex layers of intertwined and continuous testing and teaching processes integrating holistic frameworks of cultural identity and connection, knowledge and practices. Yolŋu families monitor and recognise a child's development through both direct and explicit testing and through observing children closely so that children can be supported to keep learning and growing into their knowledge, strengths and identity. Yolŋu expressed concern that such learning is invisible when the child is viewed through non-Yolŋu lenses and assessed with processes and tools from outside the community. Indigenous peoples have a right to culturally congruent assessment of their children. Those who share the child's culture and language have the expertise to ensure that cultural strengths and priorities are recognised and understood.

Indexed as

FamilyLearningAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolHumansIndigenous PeoplesQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID35980955
PMCPMC9387850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.