Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980900›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The effect of early oral postoperative feeding on the recovery of intestinal motility after gastrointestinal surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Federica Canzan, Arianna Caliaro, Maria Luisa Cavada, Elisabetta Mezzalira, Salvatore Paiella, Elisa Ambrosi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07144969 (Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07144969 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo Hospital LahoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsIleostomy Closure, Gum Chewing, Honey, Postoperative RecoveryArmsHoney, gum chewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating Effective Feeding Methods for Nutritional Management in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Post-Surgery: A Systematic Review.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federica CanzanDipartimento di Diagnostica e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-6554
Arianna CaliaroCorso di Laurea in Infermieristica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Maria Luisa CavadaCorso di Laurea in Infermieristica, Scuola Provinciale Superiore di Sanità, Bolzano, Italy.
Elisabetta MezzaliraDipartimento di Diagnostica e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore PaiellaDipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Pancreatica, Istituto del Pancreas, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa AmbrosiDipartimento di Diagnostica e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the ever-shorter length of hospital stay after surgical procedures, nowadays it is more important than ever to study interventions that may have an impact on surgical patients' wellbeing. According to the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols) program, early feeding must be considered one of the key components to facilitate early recovery while improving outcomes and patients' overall experiences. To date, the international literature has reported that early postoperative feeding compared with traditional (or late) timing is safe; nevertheless, small clinical outcomes effects has been reported, also for recovery of gastrointestinal function. Therefore, the effectiveness of early postoperative feeding to reduce postoperative ileus duration remains still debated.

objectiveTo analyse the effects of early versus delayed oral feeding (liquids and food) on the recovery of intestinal motility after gastrointestinal surgery. SEARCH

methodsPubmed, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the ClincalTrials.gov register will be searched to identify the RCTs of interest. STUDY INCLUSION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of early postoperative versus late oral feeding on major postoperative outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery will be included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors will independently screen titles and abstracts to determine the initially selected studies' inclusion. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion and consulting a third review author. The research team members will then proceed with the methodological evaluation of the studies and their eligibility for inclusion in the systematic review.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresIleusGastrointestinal MotilityHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35980900
PMCPMC9387793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.