Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980898›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Network modeling of dynamic brain interactions predicts emergence of neural information that supports human cognitive behavior.

Ravi D Mill, Julia L Hamilton, Emily C Winfield, Nicole Lalta, Richard H Chen, Michael W Cole

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ravi D MillCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9249-8744
Julia L HamiltonCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2935-8826
Emily C WinfieldCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4403-8495
Nicole LaltaCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Richard H ChenCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Michael W ColeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4329-438X
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Brain Network Mechanisms of Aging-Related Cognitive DeclineR01AG055556 · NIA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2017 to 2022
$2.3M
Brain Network Mechanisms of Instructed LearningR01MH109520 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055556NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How cognitive task behavior is generated by brain network interactions is a central question in neuroscience. Answering this question calls for the development of novel analysis tools that can firstly capture neural signatures of task information with high spatial and temporal precision (the "where and when") and then allow for empirical testing of alternative network models of brain function that link information to behavior (the "how"). We outline a novel network modeling approach suited to this purpose that is applied to noninvasive functional neuroimaging data in humans. We first dynamically decoded the spatiotemporal signatures of task information in the human brain by combining MRI-individualized source electroencephalography (EEG) with multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). A newly developed network modeling approach-dynamic activity flow modeling-then simulated the flow of task-evoked activity over more causally interpretable (relative to standard functional connectivity [FC] approaches) resting-state functional connections (dynamic, lagged, direct, and directional). We demonstrate the utility of this modeling approach by applying it to elucidate network processes underlying sensory-motor information flow in the brain, revealing accurate predictions of empirical response information dynamics underlying behavior. Extending the model toward simulating network lesions suggested a role for the cognitive control networks (CCNs) as primary drivers of response information flow, transitioning from early dorsal attention network-dominated sensory-to-response transformation to later collaborative CCN engagement during response selection. These results demonstrate the utility of the dynamic activity flow modeling approach in identifying the generative network processes underlying neurocognitive phenomena.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingCognitionElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID35980898
PMCPMC9387855
OpenAlexW4292361833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.