ArticlePLoS biology2022
Network modeling of dynamic brain interactions predicts emergence of neural information that supports human cognitive behavior.
Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain network dynamics reflect psychiatric illness status and transdiagnostic symptom profiles across health and disease.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Using connectome-based predictive models to reveal the systems standardized tests and clinical symptoms are reflecting.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Effective Connectivity Identifies Divergent Cerebro-Cerebellar Network Organization in Schizophrenia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Functional connectivity-based attractor dynamics of the human brain in rest, task, and disease.eLife · 2026Article
- Dynamically shifting from compositional to conjunctive brain representations supports cognitive task learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cortico-subcortical converging organization at rest.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the transmission of cognitive task information through optimal brain pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- State-dependent memory mechanisms insights from neural circuits and clinical implications.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered intraoperative nerve monitoring: a visionary method to reduce facial nerve palsy in parotid surgery: an editorial.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Causally informed activity flow models provide mechanistic insight into network-generated cognitive activations.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Combined methods reveal task activation dynamics in human brain networks.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Multiple brain activation patterns underlying successful visual short-term memory across the adult lifespan.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
How cognitive task behavior is generated by brain network interactions is a central question in neuroscience. Answering this question calls for the development of novel analysis tools that can firstly capture neural signatures of task information with high spatial and temporal precision (the "where and when") and then allow for empirical testing of alternative network models of brain function that link information to behavior (the "how"). We outline a novel network modeling approach suited to this purpose that is applied to noninvasive functional neuroimaging data in humans. We first dynamically decoded the spatiotemporal signatures of task information in the human brain by combining MRI-individualized source electroencephalography (EEG) with multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). A newly developed network modeling approach-dynamic activity flow modeling-then simulated the flow of task-evoked activity over more causally interpretable (relative to standard functional connectivity [FC] approaches) resting-state functional connections (dynamic, lagged, direct, and directional). We demonstrate the utility of this modeling approach by applying it to elucidate network processes underlying sensory-motor information flow in the brain, revealing accurate predictions of empirical response information dynamics underlying behavior. Extending the model toward simulating network lesions suggested a role for the cognitive control networks (CCNs) as primary drivers of response information flow, transitioning from early dorsal attention network-dominated sensory-to-response transformation to later collaborative CCN engagement during response selection. These results demonstrate the utility of the dynamic activity flow modeling approach in identifying the generative network processes underlying neurocognitive phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.