Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980665›Full record

ArticleAllergy2023

Validated allergen exposure chamber is plausible tool for the assessment of house dust mite-triggered allergic rhinitis.

Magdalena Zemelka-Wiacek, Anna Kosowska, Ewa Winiarska, Ewa Sobanska, Marek Jutel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06778213 (A Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Clinical Study for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Allergen-specific Immunotherapy Using Clinical and Biomarker Assessment in an Allergen Exposure Chamber and During Natural Exposure in Patients With House Dust Mite-triggered Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis RANSES), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06778213 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Clinical Study for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Allergen-specific Immunotherapy Using Clinical and Biomarker Assessment in an Allergen Exposure Chamber and During Natural Exposure in Patients With House Dust Mite-triggered Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis RANSES

TypeinterventionalSponsorWroclaw Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled67ConditionsAllergic RhinoconjunctivitisArmsNovoHelisen Depot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Update on HDM Allergy: Principal Changes over the Years.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magdalena Zemelka-WiacekDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-8638
Anna KosowskaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-0198
Ewa WiniarskaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-835X
Ewa SobanskaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6065-6779
Marek JutelDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-9379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergen exposure chamber (AEC) is a clinical facility that allows exposure to allergenic airborne particles in controlled environment. Although AECs offer stable levels of airborne allergens, the validation of symptoms and other endpoints induced by allergen challenge is key for their recommendation as a plausible tool for the assessment of patients, especially in clinical research. This study aimed to demonstrate the reproducibility of defined clinical endpoints after AEC house dust mite (HDM) challenge under optimal conditions in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR).

methodHDM was distributed at different concentrations. The assessment was subjective by the patients: total nasal symptom score (TNSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and objective by the investigator: acoustic rhinometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and nasal secretion weight. Safety was assessed clinically and by peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV

resultsConstant environment: temperature, humidity, and carbon dioxide (CO

conclusionHDM challenge in ALL-MED AEC offers a safe and reliable method for inducing symptoms in AR patients for the use in controlled clinical studies including allergen immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Rhinitis, AllergicRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialAllergensAnimalsAntigens, DermatophagoidesDermatophagoides pteronyssinusDustHumansPyroglyphidaeReproducibility of ResultsAllergensAntigens, DermatophagoidesDustacoustic rhinometryallergen challengeallergen exposure chamberallergic rhinitishouse dust mite

Identifiers

PMID35980665
PMCPMC10087469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.