Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980575›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Prime Editing for Precise Genome Engineering in Drosophila.

Justin A Bosch, Norbert Perrimon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin A BoschDepartment of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-1566
Norbert PerrimonDepartment of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. perrimon@genetics.med.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7542-472X

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN GENETICST32GM007748 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Louise Wilkins-Haug · 1985 to 2026
$12.0M
Functional genomics resources for the Drosophila - TR&D3P41GM132087 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2019 to 2023
$6.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Editing the Drosophila genome is incredibly useful for gene functional analysis. However, compared to gene knockouts, precise gene editing is difficult to achieve. Prime editing, a recently described CRISPR/Cas9-based technique, has the potential to make precise editing simpler and faster, and produce less errors than traditional methods. Initially described in mammalian cells, prime editing is functional in Drosophila somatic and germ cells. Here, we outline steps to design, generate, and express prime editing components in transgenic flies. Furthermore, we highlight a crossing scheme to produce edited fly stocks in less than 3 months.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDrosophilaAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGene EditingGenome, InsectMammalsCRISPRDrosophilaGenome engineeringpegRNAPrecise editingPrime editing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.