ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2022
Improving cervical cancer screening rates: a scoping review of resources and interventions.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress of metabolomics in cervical cancer.European journal of medical research · 2023Pooled it
- Test results and follow-up care stemming from an ED-based cervical cancer intervention.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Trial
- A global scoping review of interventions to increase participation in screening programmes for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2025.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Caring for the caregivers: breast and cervical cancer screening among informal caregivers of cancer patients - a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Universal Coverage of AI-Assisted Cervical Cancer Screening: Qualitative Study Based on the Macro Model of Health System.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of an optoelectronic imaging tracing system for diagnosis of high-grade cervical lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Effects of a telephone intervention on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A meta-analysis.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of health education interventions for cervical cancer screening: A quasi-experimental study in Pokhara Metropolitan Slum, Nepal.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening through Pap Smear Examination among Women Attending the Gynecology Polyclinic at Dr. Zainoel Abidin General Hospital in 2024: A Cross-Sectional Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Screening for Cervical Cancer and Early Treatment (SCCET) Project-The Programmatic Data of Romanian Experience in Primary Screening for High-Risk HPV DNA.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the possibilities and limitations of customized large language model to support and improve cervical cancer screening.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of high-risk HPV infection, cervical cancer, and precancerous lesions among women in Southwestern China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Implementation and performance barriers in Iran's breast cancer screening program: a qualitative case study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization among Kidney Transplant Recipients, 2001 to 2018.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Beyond Intention: Barriers to Undergoing a Blood Pressure Check in the South-West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Service-Delivery Models to Increase the Uptake of Non-Communicable Disease Screening in South-Central Ethiopia: A Difference-In-Differences Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A genetic variant in the TAPBP gene enhances cervical cancer susceptibility by increasing mArchives of toxicology · 2024Article
- Screening Methods for Cervical Cancer.ChemMedChem · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer mortality can be prevented through early detection with screening methods such as Pap and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) tests; however, only 81% of women aged 21-65 are up-to-date on screening. Many interventions to increase cervical cancer screening have been implemented, but there is limited understanding about which intervention components are most successful.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of existing literature and available resources for cervical cancer screening interventions to identify gaps in the research. We used t tests and correlations to identify associations among intervention components and effect sizes.
resultsOut of nine studies, the mean overall effect size for interventions was 11.3% increase in Pap testing for cervical cancer screening (range = - 4-24%). Interventions that included community health workers or one-on-one interaction had the biggest effect size (p < 0.05). No associations with effect size were noted for literacy level, number of intervention components, or targeting by race/ethnicity.
conclusionsFuture interventions may include educational sessions with community health workers or one-on-one patient interaction to improve cervical cancer screening. Further research is needed to establish effect sizes for large-scale interventions and hrHPV screening interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.