ArticleCardiovascular journal of Africa
The non-negligible association between SYNTAX score and anxiety-depressive disorders.
Article in Cardiovascular journal of Africa. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAnxiety-depressive disorders are more common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are strongly associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a wellvalidated diagnostic tool for screening of anxiety-depression disorders. The SYNTAX score (SS) is the angiographic scoring system and is commonly used to evaluate the severity and complexity of CAD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the HADS and SS.
methodsThe HADS questionnaire was filled in by subjects before the coronary angiography procedure. Biochemical, clinical and echocardiographic parameters, and SS were evaluated in all patients. Patients were assessed using the HADS. The patients were divided into two groups according to the SS [≥ 23: high SYNTAX score group (HSSG), < 23 low].
resultsThe HADS scale was significantly higher in HSSG (24.8 ± 10.7 vs 11.3 ± 6.4
conclusionsIn our study, we found that diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia and the HADS were independent predictors of a higher SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.