Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980425›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer : Treatment options for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer].

Eva M Dobrindt, Safak Gül-Klein, Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez, Felix Gronau, Peter Thuss-Patience, Beate Rau

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva M DobrindtChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Safak Gül-KleinChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Miguel Enrique Alberto VilchezChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Felix GronauChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Peter Thuss-PatienceMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Beate RauChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. beate.rau@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer is one of the most aggressive malignant diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with a high rate of metastasis. Peritoneal metastasis occurs in up to 60% of all patients and synchronously in up to 30% in locally advanced gastric cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been an established treatment option in selected patients for several years, as the HIPEC serves as an alternative administration route.

objectiveThis article presents a schematic display of the various treatment options depending on the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a gastric cancer.

methodsA literature search and analysis of the current literature on the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases were carried out. A differentiation was made between limited and extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis together with the appropriate treatment strategy.

resultsPrincipally, individual systemic chemotherapy is the backbone of treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases. In selected patients and in cases of limited peritoneal carcinomatosis, CRS and HIPEC can be conducted and survival is improved; however, CRS is still contraindicated in cases of extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis and in exceptional cases pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) can be carried out.

conclusionIn selected patients CRS and HIPEC can lead to an improvement with respect to overall and disease-free survival. In cases of extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis, individualized chemotherapy remains the major treatment option.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease-Free SurvivalHumansCytoreductionCytoreductive surgeryHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPeritoneal metastasesSystemic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35980425
OpenAlexW4300335273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.