ArticleCancer research2022
Determinants and Effectiveness of Extending the Duration of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy beyond 5 Years in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimal extension time after initial endocrine therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Time-Varying Hormonal Treatment and Metastasis-Free Survival Among ER+ Breast Cancer Patients: A Natural History Modelling Approach.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-mediated paclitaxel-loaded EGFR nanoparticles for targeted therapy in breast cancer.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Tamoxifen evolution.British journal of cancer · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical guidelines have recommended patients with high-risk breast cancer to extend adjuvant hormone therapy beyond 5 years. However, the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of extended adjuvant hormone therapy in the real world remain unknown. By linking six Swedish health registries, we prospectively followed 13,168 patients with breast cancer (2005-2020) from their first prescription of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors and categorized them as extending or not extending adjuvant hormone therapy. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate whether extended therapy was associated with breast cancer outcomes. Among patients with breast cancer who were recommended to extend adjuvant hormone therapy by the national guidelines, the proportion of women who extended therapy increased 5 folds during the past 10 years, reaching 80.9% during 2018 to 2020. Patients were more likely to extend therapy after completing 5-year adjuvant hormone therapy if they were young [40 vs. ≥65 years: OR, 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13-2.58], had positive lymph nodes (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.85-2.73), had high tumor grade (grade 3 vs. 1: OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.34-2.39), received chemotherapy (OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 4.19-6.50), had first-degree relatives who died from breast cancer (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.81), or had a high income (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.49). Extended use of adjuvant hormone therapy was statistically significantly associated with improved disease-free survival (HR, 0.72; 95 CI%, 0.55-0.95). This study provides real-world evidence showing the use and improved breast cancer outcomes of extended adjuvant hormone therapy beyond 5 years. SIGNIFICANCE: The proportion of patients with breast cancer extending adjuvant hormone therapy beyond 5 years has increased dramatically in recent years, which is associated with improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.