ArticleCurrent protocols2022
Minimal/Measurable Disease Analysis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma by Flow Cytometry.
Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Flow Cytometric Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Quantification of Measurable Residual Disease Detection by Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Clonality Testing in B-Cell and Plasma Cell Neoplasms.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2024Article
- Role of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A 6-year, single-institution experience.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2024Review
- 19-color, 21-Antigen Single Tube for Efficient Evaluation of B- and T-cell Neoplasms.Current protocols · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CLL/SLL is the most common leukemia in the western world. The disease is indolent; however, most patients require treatment at some point of the disease course. Outside of allogeneic transplants, the treatment is rarely curative but often controls CLL/SLL manifestations for many years. Several lines of therapy may be used sequentially to prolong clinical remission. Because of the prolonged disease course, CLL/SLL monitoring represents a sizable portion of the workload in a typical flow cytometry laboratory involved in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematopoietic neoplasms. Minimal/measurable disease monitoring of CLL/SLL has emerged as a key component in treatment monitoring and sequencing. In the face of effective therapies, clinical laboratories are tasked with monitoring ever smaller proportions of MRD with high precision and accuracy. With the recent addition of surface antigen-targeting biologics such as antibodies and CAR-T cells, the task has become more complex due to the unavailability of commonly analyzed antigens for flow cytometric analysis. This article details a flow cytometric test developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center that has proven to consistently achieve high sensitivity (<0.01% of nucleated cells) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, even when CD19 is lost or unavailable for analysis. Moreover, the test helps distinguish between CLL and other CD5-positive B cell neoplasms. The Basic Protocol provides a detailed operational procedure for processing, staining, and cytometric acquisition of samples. The Support Protocol provides typical steps and caveats for MRD data analysis in CLL/SLL and in distinguishing CLL/SLL from other B cell neoplasms and normal CD5-positive B cells. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Processing, staining, and cytometric analysis of bone marrow or peripheral blood cells for MRD analysis of CLL/SLL Support Protocol: Analysis and interpretation of CLL MRD assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.