Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979879›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2023

Pharmacokinetic behaviors of soft nanoparticulate formulations of chemotherapeutics.

Mahua Sarkar, Yang Wang, Oscar Ekpenyong, Dong Liang, Huan Xie

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahua SarkarCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6899-0088
Yang WangCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0429-9412
Oscar EkpenyongMerck & Co, Rahway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-3725
Dong LiangCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6632-8066
Huan XieCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0591-5619
Texas Southern University · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

Targeted Nano-drug-delivery-systems of Frist-in-class Drugs for CRPC: PK/PD Evaluation and Combination TherapyU54MD007605 · NIMHD · TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY · PI Creaque C Tyler · 2020 to 2026
$22.0M
Center for Biomedical and Health Research Excellence (CBHRE)G12MD007605 · NIMHD · TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY · PI OYEKAN, ADEBAYO O., WILSON, BOBBY L · 2014 to 2018
$7.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007605NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapeutic treatment with conventional drug formulations pose numerous challenges, such as poor solubility, high cytotoxicity and serious off-target side effects, low bioavailability, and ultimately subtherapeutic tumoral concentration leading to poor therapeutic outcomes. In the field of Nanomedicine, advances in nanotechnology have been applied with great success to design and develop novel nanoparticle-based formulations for the treatment of various types of cancer. The approval of the first nanomedicine, Doxil® (liposomal doxorubicin) in 1995, paved the path for further development for various types of novel delivery platforms. Several different types of nanoparticles, especially organic (soft) nanoparticles (liposomes, polymeric micelles, and albumin-bound nanoparticles), have been developed and approved for several anticancer drugs. Nanoparticulate drug delivery platform have facilitated to overcome of these challenges and offered key advantages of improved bioavailability, higher intra-tumoral concentration of the drug, reduced toxicity, and improved efficacy. This review introduces various commonly used nanoparticulate systems in biomedical research and their pharmacokinetic (PK) attributes, then focuses on the various physicochemical and physiological factors affecting the in vivo disposition of chemotherapeutic agents encapsulated in nanoparticles in recent years. Further, it provides a review of the current landscape of soft nanoparticulate formulations for the two most widely investigated anticancer drugs, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin, that are either approved or under investigation. Formulation details, PK profiles, and therapeutic outcomes of these novel strategies have been discussed individually and in comparison, to traditional formulations. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Cells at the Nanoscale Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNanoparticlesNeoplasmsDoxorubicinDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesPolyethylene GlycolsAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicinliposomal doxorubicinLiposomesPolyethylene Glycolschemotherapeuticsdoxorubicinpaclitaxelpharmacokineticssoft nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID35979879
PMCPMC9938089
OpenAlexW4292242419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.