Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979782›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2022

[TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury].

Shuo Ge, Lei Zhang, Zifei Zhou, Shaohua Jia, Longpo Zheng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Effectiveness analysis of 5G remote robotic surgery in pelvic fracture treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuo GeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Trauma Emergency Center, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China.
Lei Zhang.
Zifei ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Trauma Emergency Center, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China.
Shaohua JiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Trauma Emergency Center, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China.
Longpo ZhengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Trauma Emergency Center, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury. Methods: The clinical data of 76 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury between January 2016 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 45 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by TiRobot and O-arm navigation system (study group), 31 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation under the guidance of C-arm X-ray machine (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, Tile classification, time from injury to operation between the two groups ( Results: A total of 72 screws were implanted in the study group, with a median of 1 (1, 2) screws per patient. In the control group, 47 screws were implanted, with a median of 1 (1, 2) screws per patient. There was no significant difference in the number of screws between the two groups ( Conclusion: TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system is a reliable surgical method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury, which can reduce the operation time and fluoroscopy times when compared with the traditional operation under the guidance of C-arm X-ray machine. The safety, accuracy, and efficiency of the operation were improved.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePelvic BonesSurgery, Computer-AssistedBlood Loss, SurgicalBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedminimally treatmentO-arm navigation systemposterior pelvic ring injurysacroiliac screwTiRobot

Identifiers

PMID35979782
PMCPMC9379464
OpenAlexW4302356667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.