Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979732›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2022

Aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas.

Hélène Lasolle, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Emmanuel Jouanneau, Mirela Diana Ilie, Gérald Raverot

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. EndoBridge 2024: pearls and highlights.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hélène LasolleInserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alexandre VasiljevicInserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel JouanneauInserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Mirela Diana IlieInserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Gérald RaverotInserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-338X
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary tumors are generally benign, although in rare cases aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and carcinomas present important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and are associated with a high mortality rate. Almost half of these APTs and carcinomas are corticotroph tumors, suggesting a specific prognosis. Clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic markers are limited and do not allow early management of these tumors. Temozolomide remains the first-line treatment once a diagnosis of aggressive pituitary tumor or carcinoma has been made. Novel alternative treatments exist, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, which can be used in the case of temozolomide treatment failure. The aim of this review is to present the clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics of aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas, and to describe the results obtained with currently available treatments.

Indexed as

AdenomaCarcinomaPituitary NeoplasmsCorticotrophsHumansTemozolomideTemozolomideaggressive pituitary tumorcorticotroph tumorCushing's diseasepituitary carcinomatemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID35979732
PMCPMC9542524
OpenAlexW4281846341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.