Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979584›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2022

The challenges of decolonising participatory research in indigenous contexts: the

Lucie Nadeau, Dominique Gaulin, Janique Johnson-Lafleur, Carolane Levesque, Sarah Fraser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucie NadeauDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Dominique GaulinÉcole de travail social, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Janique Johnson-LafleurDepartment of Anthropology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Carolane LevesqueDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sarah FraserDepartment of Psychoeducation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR PJT-159473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, research involving Indigenous peoples has been the scene of power imbalances between Indigenous communities and researchers. Indigenous peoples have often been put in the position of passive subjects of research rather than participants or collaborators with agency, a situation that the current movement of decolonisation of research and practices in the field of Indigenous health aims to counteract. Participatory research seeks a better balance of input, decision-making and power between research participants and research teams and values participants' knowledges. As such, it is a particularly relevant approach for researchers to involve community members and support self-determination of Indigenous people. Yet, if its explicit intentions are aiming at a decolonising approach, the socio-structural context of participatory research initiatives in Indigenous communities brings obstacles to the approach's success. The development and implementation of the participatory project

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchIndigenous PeoplesAdolescentHumansPersonal AutonomyPopulation GroupscolonialityCommunity of practicedecolonisationInuitparticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID35979584
PMCPMC9397418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.