Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979461›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

The acceptance to heterologous booster vaccination of COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and targeted population: A cross-sectional study in central China.

Wei Qin, Xiaqing Zhang, Yao Wang, Fan Pan, Kai Cheng, Fangfang Huang, Jian Song, Hong Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei QinDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiaqing ZhangDepartment of Expanded Program on Immunization, Lu'an Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China.
Yao WangDepartment of Expanded Program on Immunization, Lu'an Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China.
Fan PanDepartment of Expanded Program on Immunization, Lu'an Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China.
Kai ChengDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Fangfang HuangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
Jian SongDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hong SuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNBengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are few studies reported on the acceptance of heterologous booster vaccination for the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) and the general population. We aimed to address that gap and explore determinant factors of acceptance of the heterologous booster vaccination. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine the prevalence and determinant factors of the acceptance of heterologous booster vaccination for the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and the targeted population. Results: A total of 364 HCWs and 1,898 targeted populations were investigated in our study. 76.4% HCWs would recommend heterologous booster vaccination to their patients and 59.8% targeted population endorsed a clear willingness to receive this strategy. Compared with the adenoviral vector vaccine (AD5-nCOV), recombinant protein vaccine (ZF2001) was more preferred by HCWs (79.1%) and the targeted population (72.0%) as a heterologous booster vaccine. HCWs who did not work in the vaccination clinics were more likely to recommend heterologous booster vaccination (OR = 3.3, CI: 1.5-7.3). The targeted population aged 18-59 years (OR = 1.5, 95% CI:1.1-2.3), had a positive attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.7-8.6), had confidence in the safety of COVID-19 vaccines (OR = 6.6, 95% CI: 4.2-10.2), followed the recommendation of HCWs (OR = 33.6, 95% CI: 22.0-51.2), took initiative in collecting booster shots information (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.0), and were familiar with the heterologous strategy (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.1) were more likely to choose heterologous booster vaccination. The history of side effects of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine was a negative factor in choosing heterologous booster vaccination (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.4-1.0). Conclusions: The heterologous booster vaccination strategy on the COVID-19 vaccine could be widely accepted among HCWs, whereas its acceptance among targeted population was only moderate. Public authorities should make efforts to communicate the public about the effectiveness and safety of the heterologous booster vaccination which could help increase their willingness to get vaccinated.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesacceptanceCOVID-19healthcare workers (HCWs)heterologous booster vaccinationwillingness

Identifiers

PMID35979461
PMCPMC9376472
OpenAlexW4289169872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.