ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
The bottom-up information transfer process and top-down attention control underlying tonal working memory.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroregulatory Effects of Microcone Patch Stimulation on the Auricular Branch of the Vagus Nerve and the Prefrontal Cortex: A Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- SF-MVPA: A from raw data to statistical results and surface space-based MVPA toolbox.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tonal working memory has been less investigated by neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies and even less in terms of tonal working memory load. In this study, we analyzed the dynamic cortical processing process of tonal working memory with an original surface-space-based multivariate pattern analysis (sf-MVPA) method and found that this process constituted a bottom-up information transfer process. Then, the local cortical activity pattern, local cortical response strength, and cortical functional connectivity under different tonal working memory loads were investigated. No brain area's local activity pattern or response strength was significantly different under different memory loads. Meanwhile, the interactions between the auditory cortex (AC) and an attention control network were linearly correlated with the memory load. This finding shows that the neural mechanism underlying the tonal working memory load does not arise from changes in local activity patterns or changes in the local response strength, but from top-down attention control. Our results indicate that the implementation of tonal working memory is based on the cooperation of the bottom-up information transfer process and top-down attention control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.