Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979303›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Pregnancy-related psychopathology: A comparison between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19-related social restriction periods.

Daniela Chieffo, Carla Avallone, Annamaria Serio, Georgios Demetrios Kotzalidis, Marta Balocchi, Ilaria De Luca, Daniele Hirsch, Angela Gonsalez Del Castillo, Pierluigi Lanzotti, Giuseppe Marano and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 pandemic effects: Examining prenatal internalizing symptoms and infant temperament.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela ChieffoService of Clinical Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome 00168, Italy.
Carla AvalloneDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Annamaria SerioService of Clinical Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome 00168, Italy.
Georgios Demetrios KotzalidisDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy. giorgio.kotzalidis@uniroma1.it.
Marta BalocchiService of Clinical Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome 00168, Italy.
Ilaria De LucaDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Daniele HirschDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Angela Gonsalez Del CastilloDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Pierluigi LanzottiDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Giuseppe MaranoDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Lucio RinaldiDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
Antonio LanzoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome 00168, Italy.
Eugenio MercuriPaediatric Neurology Unit, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome 00168, Italy.
Marianna MazzaDepartment of Geriatrics, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.
Gabriele SaniDepartment of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome 00168, Italy.
University of the Sacred Heart · JPAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted in a still undefined way pregnant women's mental health. There are reports of mood and affect changes in the general population and the suggestion that similar changes occur also in the pregnant population. The greater vulnerability of women during the COVID-19 restriction period may translate into a greater risk for mental disorders in the gestational period. We hypothesised that pregnant women in the pre-pandemic period would have less psychopathology and more psychological support than pregnant women during the pandemic restriction period.

aimTo compare pregnant women for anxiety, prenatal depression, psychopathology, and social support before and after the awareness of the pandemic.

methodsWe administered to women willing to participate in their 2

resultsThe nonCOVID-19 group reported higher support from partners only, while the COVID-19 group reported multiple support (

conclusionThe ability of pregnant women to deal with novel generalised threats involves mobilization of inner resources. Increasing sources of social support may have produced anxiolysis in the COVID-19 sample.

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19 pandemicDepressionPregnancyPsychopathologySocial Support

Identifiers

PMID35979303
PMCPMC9294903
OpenAlexW4283364948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.