Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979149›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2022

The impact of COVID-19 on radiological findings in patients accessing the emergency department: a multicentric study.

Vincenzo Vingiani, Andres F Abadia, Gianfranco Belmonte, Claudia Rutigliano, Luigi Pasqualetto, Alfonso Presidente, Claudio Napolitano, Maurizio Lelario, Antonio Corvino, Alessandro Posa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincenzo VingianiDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Andres F AbadiaDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Gianfranco BelmonteU.O.C. Radiologia, Azienda ospedaliera regionale San Carlo, Potenza, Italy.
Claudia RutiglianoU.O.C. Radiologia, Ospedale "L. Bonomo" di Andria, Andria, Italy.
Luigi PasqualettoU.O.C. Radiologia, P.O. Sorrento, Ospedali riuniti "Area penisola Sorrentina", Sorrento, Italy.
Alfonso PresidenteU.O.C. Radiologia, P.O. Sorrento, Ospedali riuniti "Area penisola Sorrentina", Sorrento, Italy.
Claudio NapolitanoU.O.C. Radiologia, Azienda ospedaliera regionale San Carlo, Potenza, Italy.
Maurizio LelarioU.O.C. Radiologia, Ospedale "L. Bonomo" di Andria, Andria, Italy.
Antonio CorvinoDepartment of Movement Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Alessandro PosaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy, and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Ospedale L. Bonomo · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITMedical University of South Carolina · USOspedale di Bolzano · ITParthenope University of Naples · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this multicentric study is to illustrate how the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown affected the workload and outcomes of radiological examinations in emergency radiology. Material and methods: The exams performed in the radiology departments of 4 Italian hospitals during 3 weeks of the Italian lockdown were retrospectively reviewed and compared to the exams conducted during the same period in 2019. Only exams from the emergency department (ED) were included. Two radiologists from each hospital defined the cases as positive or negative findings, based on independent blind readings of the imaging studies. In the case of differences in the evaluation, consensus was reached amongst them via discussion. Continuous measurements are presented as median and interquartile range, while categorical measurements are presented as frequency and percentage; Results: There were 745 patients (53% male; 62 years [44-78]) who underwent radiological examinations in 2020 vs. 2623 (52% male; 56 years [35-76]) in 2019 ( Conclusions: Our findings show that despite the reduction of emergency radiological examinations, there was a rela-tive increase in the number of positive cases. These significant findings are crucial to ensure better organization of radiology departments and improve patient management during similar health emergencies in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19emergency departmentemergency radiologyepidemiology studyimage findings

Identifiers

PMID35979149
PMCPMC9373861
OpenAlexW4293311498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.