Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979128›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder: Lights and shadows.

Carmen Concerto, Giuseppe Lanza, Francesco Fisicaro, Manuela Pennisi, Alessandro Rodolico, Giulia Torrisi, Rita Bella, Eugenio Aguglia

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmen ConcertoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania 95124, Italy.
Giuseppe LanzaDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy.
Francesco FisicaroDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy.
Manuela PennisiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy.
Alessandro RodolicoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania 95124, Italy.
Giulia TorrisiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania 95124, Italy.
Rita BellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy.
Eugenio AgugliaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania 95124, Italy.
University of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have read with interest the publication that describes the available data related to the use of neuromodulation strategies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite treatment advances, however, a substantial proportion of PTSD patients receiving psychological and/or pharmacological treatment do not reach an adequate clinical response. In their paper, the authors draw attention to the current understanding of the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a potential treatment for PTSD. Most of the previous studies indeed applied both inhibitory (1 Hz) and excitatory (> 1 Hz, up to 20 Hz) rTMS to the right and/or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Despite larger therapeutic effects observed when high-frequency stimulation was applied, the question of which side and frequency of stimulation is the most successful is still debated. The authors also reported on the after-effect of rTMS related to neuroplasticity and identified the intermittent theta burst stimulation as a technique of particular interest because of it showed the most effective improvement on PTSD symptoms. However, although numerous studies have highlighted the possible beneficial use of rTMS protocols for PTSD, the exact mechanism of action remains unclear. In their conclusions, the authors stated that rTMS has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of PTSD symptoms. Nevertheless, we believe that further research with homogeneous samples, standardized protocols, and objective outcome measures is needed to identify specific therapeutic targets and to better define significant changes when active and sham stimulation procedures are compared.

Indexed as

MetaplasticityNeuromodulationNeuroplasticityPost-traumatic stress disorderRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationTranslational neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID35979128
PMCPMC9258373
OpenAlexW4281785312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.