Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979075›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Evaluating the resistance mechanism of

Hasnain Alam, Muhammad Zamin, Muhammad Adnan, Nisar Ahmad, Taufiq Nawaz, Shah Saud, Abdul Basir, Ke Liu, Matthew Tom Harrison, Shah Hassan and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Hasnain AlamDepartment of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ZaminDepartment of Agriculture, University of Swabi, Swabi, Pakistan.
Muhammad AdnanDepartment of Agriculture, University of Swabi, Swabi, Pakistan.
Nisar AhmadDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, Pakistan.
Taufiq NawazDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Shah SaudCollege of Life Science, Linyi University, Linyi, China.
Abdul BasirDepartment of Agriculture, University of Swabi, Swabi, Pakistan.
Ke LiuTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS, Australia.
Matthew Tom HarrisonTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS, Australia.
Shah HassanDepartment of Agricultural Extension Education & Communication, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Hesham F AlharbyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yahya M AlzahraniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sameera A AlghamdiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali MajrashiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Basmah M AlharbiDepartment of Biology,, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Nadiyah M AlabdallahDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Shah FahadHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
King Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of Swabi · PKThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKUniversity of Tasmania · AUImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SALinyi University · CNTaif University · SAUnited Arab Emirates University · AEUniversity of Haripur · PKUniversity of Science and Technology Bannu · PKUniversity of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of food and forage crops that flourish under saline conditions may be a prospective avenue for mitigating the impacts of climate change, both allowing biomass production under conditions of water-deficit and potentially expanding land-use to hitherto non-arable zones. Here, we examine responses of the native halophytic shrub Atriplex leucoclada to salt and drought stress using a factorial design, with four levels of salinity and four drought intensities under the arid conditions. A. leucoclada plants exhibited morphological and physiological adaptation to salt and water stress which had little effect on survival or growth. Under low salinity stress, water stress decreased the root length of A. leucoclada; in contrast, under highly saline conditions root length increased. Plant tissue total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content decreased with increasing water stress under low salinity. As salt stress increased, detrimental effects of water deficit diminished. We found that both salt and water stress had increased Na

Indexed as

A. leucocladaalternate cropssaline agriculturesalt stresswater stress

Identifiers

PMID35979075
PMCPMC9377539
OpenAlexW4289130687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.