ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
A Case Study of Multiple Maintenance Efficacy in Gynaecological Surgery Assessed by Deep Learning.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning is a new learning concept and a highly effective way of learning, which is still being explored in the field of nursing education. This paper analyses the effectiveness of interventions in perioperative gynaecological care using humanised care in the operating theatre and the impact of this model of care on patients' psychological well-being and sleep quality. A deep learning-based vision robot was designed to provide higher quality of care for our human care and simplify our approach to gynaecological surgery. The anxiety and depression scores of the two groups were significantly improved after and before care, and the scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.