Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979050›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Double-Balanced Loss for Imbalanced Colorectal Lesion Classification.

Chang Yu, Wei Sun, Qilin Xiong, Junbo Gao, Guoqiang Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chang YuInformation Engineering College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4935-2878
Wei SunInformation Engineering College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1166-5836
Qilin XiongInformation Engineering College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8701-4856
Junbo GaoInformation Engineering College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7370-9780
Guoqiang QuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Hospital, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-7204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence rate in all countries around the world, and the survival rate of patients is improved by early detection. With the development of object detection technology based on deep learning, computer-aided diagnosis of colonoscopy medical images becomes a reality, which can effectively reduce the occurrence of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. In medical image recognition, the assumption that training samples follow independent identical distribution (IID) is the key to the high accuracy of deep learning. However, the classification of medical images is unbalanced in most cases. This paper proposes a new loss function named the double-balanced loss function for the deep learning model, to improve the impact of datasets on classification accuracy. It introduces the effects of sample size and sample difficulty to the loss calculation and deals with both sample size imbalance and sample difficulty imbalance. And it combines with deep learning to build the medical diagnosis model for colorectal cancer. Experimentally verified by three colorectal white-light endoscopic image datasets, the double-balanced loss function proposed in this paper has better performance on the imbalance classification problem of colorectal medical images.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumans

Identifiers

PMID35979050
PMCPMC9377973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.