Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Need for HTA supported risk factor screening for hypertension and diabetes in Nepal: A systematic scoping review.

Chiranjivi Adhikari, Rojana Dhakal, Lal Mani Adhikari, Bijaya Parajuli, Khem Raj Subedi, Yeshoda Aryal, Arjun Kumar Thapa, Komal Shah

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chiranjivi AdhikariDepartment of Public Health, SHAS, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Rojana DhakalDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Lal Mani AdhikariHealth Research and Social Development Forum International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bijaya ParajuliMinistry of Health and Population, Gandaki Province, Myagdi Health Office, Myagdi, Nepal.
Khem Raj SubediDepartment of Economics, Far Western University, Tikapur Multiple Campus, Kailali, Nepal.
Yeshoda AryalMinistry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Arjun Kumar ThapaDepartment of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Komal ShahIndian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India.
Ministry of Health and Population · NPPokhara University · NPFar-western University · NPIndian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar · INUniversity of Nicosia · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a comprehensive and important tool for assessment and decision-making in public health and healthcare practice. It is recommended by the WHO and has been applied in practice in many countries, mostly the developed ones. HTA might be an important tool to achieve universal health coverage (UHC), especially beneficial to low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC). Even though the Package for Essential Non-communicable Diseases (PEN) has already been initiated, there is a clear policy gap in the HTA of any health device, service, or procedure, including the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in Nepal. Hence, we carried out the review to document the HTA supported evidence of hypertension and diabetes screening, as CVRFs in Nepal. Materials and methods: We searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, along with some gray literature published in the last 6 years (2016-2021) in a systematic way with a controlled vocabulary using a well-designed and pilot tested search strategy, screened them, and a total of 53 articles and reports that matched the screening criteria were included for the review. We then, extracted the data in a pre-designed MS-Excel format, first in one, and then, from it, in two, with more specific data. Results: Of 53 included studies, we reported the prevalence and/or proportion of hypertension and diabetes with various denominators. Furthermore, HTA-related findings such as cost, validity, alternative tool or technology, awareness, and intervention effectiveness have been documented and discussed further, however, not summarized due to their sparingness. Conclusion: Overall, the prevalence of DM (4.4-18.8%) and HTN (17.2-70.0%) was reported in most studies, with a few, covering other aspects of HTA of DM/HTN. A national policy for establishing an HTA agency and some immediately implementable actions are highly recommended.

Indexed as

cardiovasculardiabeteshealth technology assessment (HTA)hypertensionNepalreviewrisk factorscreening

Identifiers

PMID35979024
PMCPMC9376353
OpenAlexW4289130760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.