ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translational dysregulation as a mechanistic driver of cognitive, behavioral, and affective phenotypes in FXS and TSC.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Predictors of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in ICU Survivors After Discharge: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multimorbidity in dementia: Current perspectives and future challenges.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Brain Fog and Cognitive Dysfunction in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Evidence-Based Review.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025Review
- Study on the Relationship between Cerebral Blood Perfusion, Neuronal Cytokines and Cognitive Function in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2024Article
- Possible Application of Melatonin in Long COVID.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normal cognitive function depends on a continuous and optimally regulated blood supply, and any pathology that further reduces cerebral blood perfusion in addition to that caused by aging could damage or destroy vulnerable neurons of the brain. Furthermore, glucose serves a crucial role as the primary fuel source for the mammalian brain and any disturbance in its circulating concentrations could directly affect brain function. The term cognitive dysfunction (CD), known also as 'brain fog', refers to deficits in attention, verbal and non-verbal learning, short-term and working memory, visual and auditory processing, mathematic problem solving, processing speed, focusing on a specific topic, and motor functioning. CD is the end-point of various cardiovascular, neural, metabolic and immune function impairments. Although CD has a serious impact on patient survival and quality of life, usually it is clinically underestimated. CD is currently assessed using cognitive tests (questionnaires), which have important limitations in their diagnostic capacity, specifically in the preclinical forms of CD. Cognitive tests may not identify subclinical cases of CD but diagnose CD only when symptoms are clinically overt. Furthermore, these tests do not provide information regarding the underlying pathophysiologic background of CD. The aim of the present review is to summarize the existing literature on CD and emphasize the role of combined brain-heart magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in its early diagnosis, before CD questionnaires are abnormal. Combined brain/heart MRI has the potential to identify patients with CD at an early stage, facilitating risk stratification and early intervention. Furthermore, in parallel with brain assessment, it provides valuable information regarding the effect of the underlying disease on the myocardium. Equipment availability, physician familiarity and cost/effectiveness should be considered before wide clinical application of combined brain/heart MRI is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.