Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978814›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

C-reactive protein provides superior prognostic accuracy than the IMDC risk model in renal cell carcinoma treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab.

Ahmad Y Abuhelwa, Joaquim Bellmunt, Ganessan Kichenadasse, Ross A McKinnon, Andrew Rowland, Michael J Sorich, Ashley M Hopkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad Y AbuhelwaCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Joaquim BellmuntBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Ganessan KichenadasseCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ross A McKinnonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andrew RowlandCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Michael J SorichCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ashley M HopkinsCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Flinders University · AUFlinders Medical Centre · AUHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is the main treatment option for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, significant heterogeneity in response is commonly observed. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy. Patients and Methods: Data from patients with mRCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the IMmotion150 and IMmotion151 trials were pooled. Cox proportional regression was used to model prognostic associations. The relative importance of CRP against International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) factors was confirmed using machine learning. Results: CRPs were available from 527 patients (mean[range] CRP, 6.3[0.21-340]mg/L). Elevated CRP was significantly associated with worse OS (HR[95%CI], 1.71[1.54-1.90], p<0.001) and PFS (1.27[1.18-1.35], p<0.001). CRP was the most prognostic factor for survival within the available clinicopathological data. The prognostic performance of CRP was superior to IMDC model for OS (CRP c=0.76, IMDC c=0.67, p<0.001) and PFS (CRP OS c=0.62, IMDC c=0.59, p=0.03). Predicted 2-year OS probabilities for patients with CRP values of 0.5, 5, 40, and 150 mg/L were 96%, 73%, 42%, and 23%, respectively. Conclusions: CRP is a powerful prognostic marker for survival, and its prognostic value was superior to the IMDC risk model. This study highlights that CRP could be implemented as stratification factor for mRCC immunotherapy trials and potentially as an easy-to-use prognostic tool in the clinic.

Indexed as

C-reactive proteinIMDC modelimmunotherapyrenal cell carcinomasurvival prognosis

Identifiers

PMID35978814
PMCPMC9376479
OpenAlexW4289170342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.