Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978811›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Using deep learning to distinguish malignant from benign parotid tumors on plain computed tomography images.

Ziyang Hu, Baixin Wang, Xiao Pan, Dantong Cao, Antian Gao, Xudong Yang, Ying Chen, Zitong Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MR Image Fusion-Based Parotid Gland Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziyang HuDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Baixin WangSchool of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao PanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Dantong CaoDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Antian GaoDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xudong YangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ying ChenSchool of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zitong LinDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of deep-learning models to distinguish malignant from benign parotid tumors on plain computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: The CT images of 283 patients with parotid tumors were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. Of them, 150 were benign and 133 were malignant according to pathology results. A total of 917 regions of interest of parotid tumors were cropped (456 benign and 461 malignant). Three deep-learning networks (ResNet50, VGG16_bn, and DenseNet169) were used for diagnosis (approximately 3:1 for training and testing). The diagnostic efficiencies (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve [AUC]) of three networks were calculated and compared based on the 917 images. To simulate the process of human diagnosis, a voting model was developed at the end of the networks and the 283 tumors were classified as benign or malignant. Meanwhile, 917 tumor images were classified by two radiologists (A and B) and original CT images were classified by radiologist B. The diagnostic efficiencies of the three deep-learning network models (after voting) and the two radiologists were calculated. Results: For the 917 CT images, ResNet50 presented high accuracy and sensitivity for diagnosing malignant parotid tumors; the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90.8%, 91.3%, 90.4%, and 0.96, respectively. For the 283 tumors, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ResNet50 (after voting) were 92.3%, 93.5% and 91.2%, respectively. Conclusion: ResNet50 presented high sensitivity in distinguishing malignant from benign parotid tumors on plain CT images; this made it a promising auxiliary diagnostic method to screen malignant parotid tumors.

Indexed as

computed tomographyconvolutional neural networkdeep learningparotid tumorresidual neural network

Identifiers

PMID35978811
PMCPMC9376440
OpenAlexW4289172107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.