Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978805›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A comprehensive comparison of circulating tumor cells and breast imaging modalities as screening tools for breast cancer in Chinese women.

Xuan Shao, Xiaoyan Jin, Zhigang Chen, Zhigang Zhang, Wuzhen Chen, Jingxin Jiang, Zhen Wang, Ying Cui, Wan-Hung Fan, Ke Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xuan ShaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan JinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhigang ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhigang ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Wuzhen ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jingxin JiangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ying CuiHangzhou Watson Biotech, Hangzhou, China.
Wan-Hung FanHangzhou Watson Biotech, Hangzhou, China.
Ke WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiuyan YuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jian HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNBlood Center of Zhejiang Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been recognized as a sensitive biomarker for breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to comprehensively compare CTC with imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, mammography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in screening for BC in Chinese women. Methods: Three hundred forty-three participants were enrolled in this study, including 102 treatment-naive BC patients, 177 with breast benign diseases (BBD) and 64 healthy female patients. All participants underwent CTC testing and at least one of the following examinations, ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University between December 2017 and November 2020. CTCs were quantitatively assessed using cell counting (CTC detection rate/counts) and categorically examined using a cutoff value (CTC classification). The diagnostic power of CTC tests and imaging modalities, including accuracy and capability to predict clinicopathological characteristics of BC, were evaluated and compared. Results: CTC classification with a cutoff value of 2 showed a "good" diagnostic accuracy of 0.889 for early- to mid-stage BC comparable to breast imaging modalities using Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity of 0.872 for BC, and CTC classification had the highest specificity of 0.938. A relatively low sensitivity was found for mammography in this cohort of patients. Successful detection of BC by CTC detection rate/counts, but not CTC classification, correlated with two important clinicopathological features, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. The detection power of certain imaging modalities was also associated with AJCC stage (ultrasonography, Conclusions: CTC tests have a diagnostic potency comparable to breast imaging modalities, and may be used as an alternative screening tool for BC.

Indexed as

breast cancercirculating tumor cellsdiagnosismagnetic resonance imagingmammographyultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35978805
PMCPMC9377692
OpenAlexW4289169412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.