Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978731›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2022

Correlation between hepatorenal index and attenuation imaging for assessing hepatic steatosis.

Shrivuthsun Srigandan, Marilyn Zelesco, Steven Abbott, Christopher J Welman

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Corrigendum.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Ultrasound research - Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shrivuthsun SrigandanDepartment of Medical Imaging Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3815-5334
Marilyn ZelescoDepartment of Medical Imaging Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-0180
Steven AbbottDepartment of Medical Imaging Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-4436
Christopher J WelmanDepartment of Medical Imaging Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-940X
Fiona Stanley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatic steatosis screening is required to assess high-risk populations, identify those for intervention, monitor response and prevent disease progression and complications. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction are current gold standards, but are limited by biopsy risk factors, patient tolerance and cost. Non-invasive, cost-effective, semi-quantitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment exists. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the semi-quantitative hepatorenal index (HRI) to assess hepatic steatosis using the quantitative attenuation imaging (ATI) as a reference standard, in adults with varied suspected liver pathologies. Methods: Data were collected prospectively between April 2019 and March 2020 at a tertiary institution on any patient >18 years referred to US assessment of suspected liver pathology. The only exclusion criteria were absent or invalid HRI or ATI measurements. Three hundred fifty eight patients were included. Results: There was a significant weak positive correlation between HRI and ATI (r = 0.351, P < 0.001) and between HRI steatosis grade (SG) and ATI SG (r = 0.329, P < 0.001), using previously established cut-off values. With ATI as the reference standard, there was no significant correlation between HRI and hepatic steatosis within steatosis grades, nor for no (SG = 0) or any (SG > 0) hepatic steatosis. Conclusions: Our study in a typical heterogeneous clinical population suggests the semi-quantitative HRI is of limited use in hepatic steatosis imaging. As HRI is the objective measure of the subjective brightness (B)-mode assessment, this imaging feature may not be as reliable as previously thought. Quantitative ATI may be the preferred non-invasive technique for hepatic steatosis assessment.

Indexed as

attenuation imaginghepatic steatosishepatorenal indexsteatosis grade

Identifiers

PMID35978731
PMCPMC9351430
OpenAlexW4283772898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.