Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978691›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2022

SJPYT-195: A Designed Nuclear Receptor Degrader That Functions as a Molecular Glue Degrader of GSPT1.

Andrew D Huber, Yongtao Li, Wenwei Lin, Annalise N Galbraith, Ashutosh Mishra, Shaina N Porter, Jing Wu, Rebecca R Florke Gee, Wei Zhuang, Shondra M Pruett-Miller and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Structure-guided approach to modulate small molecule binding to a promiscuous ligand-activated protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew D HuberDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Yongtao LiDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Wenwei LinDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Annalise N GalbraithDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Ashutosh MishraCenter for Proteomics and Metabolomics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Shaina N PorterDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Jing WuDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Rebecca R Florke GeeDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Wei ZhuangDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Shondra M Pruett-MillerDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.
Junmin PengCenter for Proteomics and Metabolomics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-7648
Taosheng ChenDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-3809
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Regulation of xenobiotic receptors PXR and CAR: implications in drug dispositionR35GM118041 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Taosheng Chen · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported a specific inverse agonist (SPA70) of the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, derivatization of SPA70 yielded only agonists and neutral antagonists, suggesting that inverse agonism of PXR is difficult to achieve. Therefore, we sought to design proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) aimed at inducing PXR degradation. Conjugation of a SPA70 derivative to ligands of the E3 substrate receptor cereblon (CRBN) resulted in one molecule, SJPYT-195, that reduced PXR protein level in an optimized degradation assay described here. Further analysis revealed that SJPYT-195 was a molecular glue degrader of the translation termination factor GSPT1 and that GSPT1 degradation resulted in subsequent reduction of PXR protein. GSPT1 has recently gained interest as an anticancer target, and our results give new insights into chemical determinants of drug-induced GSPT1 degradation. Additionally, we have developed assays and cell models for PXR degrader discovery that can be applied to additional protein targets.

Identifiers

PMID35978691
PMCPMC9377019
OpenAlexW4285492824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.