Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978665›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of hepatology2022

Second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Time for more individualized treatment options?

Senthil Rajappa, Kun-Ming Rau, Palanki Satya Dattatreya, Anant Ramaswamy, Philana Fernandes, Aarohan Pruthi, Rebecca Cheng, Mariusz Lukanowski, Yi-Hsiang Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Senthil RajappaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India.
Kun-Ming RauCollege of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 822, Taiwan.
Palanki Satya DattatreyaDepartment of Oncology, Omega Hospital, Hyderabad 500034, India.
Anant RamaswamyDepartment of Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India.
Philana FernandesGlobal Scientific Communications, Eli Lilly and Company Ltd, Cork 48006, Cork, Ireland.
Aarohan PruthiMedical Affairs, Eli Lilly India, Haryana 122001, India.
Rebecca ChengMedical Affairs, Eli Lilly Taiwan, Taipei 10543, Taiwan.
Mariusz LukanowskiMedical Affairs, Eli Lilly, Herlev 2370, Denmark.
Yi-Hsiang HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei 112, Taiwan. yhhuang@vghtpe.gov.tw.
Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute · INEli Lilly (India) · INEli Lilly (Ireland) · IEHerlev Hospital · DKI-Shou University · TWMicro-Star International (Taiwan) · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWOmega Consult (Slovenia) · SITata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequently diagnosed primary tumor of the liver and is usually detected as advanced disease. It is an aggressive disease that often progresses rapidly when it fails to respond to treatment. As such, patients have limited opportunities to try different subsequent-line treatment regimens. In the last 5 years, the number of agents and/or regimens available for the treatment of advanced HCC has significantly increased, which has made treatment choices for this patient population increasingly complex. In the second-line setting, several phase III trials of regorafenib (RESORCE), ramucirumab (REACH/REACH-2), and cabozantinib (CELESTIAL) have demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with the disease. However, the median overall survival of patients with advanced HCC remains unchanged at approximately 12 mo from the start of systemic second-line therapy, with a limited duration of response. Evidence from the REACH/REACH-2 trials demonstrated for the first time that baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels can be used as an identification factor to select those who are likely to benefit the most from ramucirumab treatment. Ramucirumab is both well tolerated and efficacious and has a clinically acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it should be considered an option for patients with AFP levels ≥ 400 ng/mL.

Indexed as

Alpha-fetoproteinHepatocellular carcinomaPrognostic factorRamucirumabSecond-line treatmentSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35978665
PMCPMC9258252
OpenAlexW4283163969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.