ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2022
Poultry diseases diagnostics models using deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging and Re-Emerging Viral Infections in Poultry: Integrating Traditional and AI-Based Control Strategies.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- Machine learning classification of dilated cardiomyopathy severity in commercial broiler chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Computer vision models for precision poultry farming: A narrative review of behavioral and welfare monitoring studies.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Precision Livestock Farming and Biomedical Engineering: Assessing Feed Quality, Animal Health, and Behavior Using Machine Learning for Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review on Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence for Poultry Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Host-Microbe Interactions: Prospects of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Technologies in Animal Viral Disease Management.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Coccidiosis in chickens: From temporal patterns of Lesion development and Oocyst shedding to predictive modeling.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Edge intelligence for poultry welfare: Utilizing tiny machine learning neural network processors for vocalization analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Droppings as Sensitive Markers of Chicken Health Status.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Analysis of Emerging Variants of Turkey Reovirus using Machine Learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- An efficient segmentation model for abnormal chicken droppings recognition based on improved deep dual-resolution network.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Poultry fecal imagery dataset for health status prediction: A case of South-West Nigeria.Data in brief · 2023Article
- Towards Early Poultry Health Prediction through Non-Invasive and Computer Vision-Based Dropping Classification.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Innovative applications of artificial intelligence in zoonotic disease management.Science in One Health · 2023Review
- Translating conventional wisdom on chicken comb color into automated monitoring of disease-infected chicken using chromaticity-based machine learning models.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coccidiosis, Salmonella, and Newcastle are the common poultry diseases that curtail poultry production if they are not detected early. In Tanzania, these diseases are not detected early due to limited access to agricultural support services by poultry farmers. Deep learning techniques have the potential for early diagnosis of these poultry diseases. In this study, a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model was developed to diagnose poultry diseases by classifying healthy and unhealthy fecal images. Unhealthy fecal images may be symptomatic of Coccidiosis, Salmonella, and Newcastle diseases. We collected 1,255 laboratory-labeled fecal images and fecal samples used in Polymerase Chain Reaction diagnostics to annotate the laboratory-labeled fecal images. We took 6,812 poultry fecal photos using an Open Data Kit. Agricultural support experts annotated the farm-labeled fecal images. Then we used a baseline CNN model, VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, and Xception models. We trained models using farm and laboratory-labeled fecal images and then fine-tuned them. The test set used farm-labeled images. The test accuracies results without fine-tuning were 83.06% for the baseline CNN, 85.85% for VGG16, 94.79% for InceptionV3, 87.46% for MobileNetV2, and 88.27% for Xception. Finetuning while freezing the batch normalization layer improved model accuracies, resulting in 95.01% for VGG16, 95.45% for InceptionV3, 98.02% for MobileNetV2, and 98.24% for Xception, with F1 scores for all classifiers above 75% in all four classes. Given the lighter weight of the trained MobileNetV2 and its better ability to generalize, we recommend deploying this model for the early detection of poultry diseases at the farm level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.