ArticleBioMed research international2022
Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Single-Center Experience from East China.
Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of gasless vNOTES vs. traditional vNOTES on hemodynamic profiles and outcomes in patients with benign gynecological disease: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted single-site port for benign hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Retracted: Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Single-Center Experience from East China.BioMed research international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-21Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNOTES) versus transumbilical laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) as a minimal invasive technique. Results: 361 women were included in our study, with 228 in the VNOTES groups, 129 in the LESS groups, and 4 conversions from VNOTES to LESS technique. The length of a VNOTES hysterectomy was shorter than that of LESS (80.76 min versus 112.09 min; MD -31.34 min; 95% CI -40.24 to -22.43 min; Conclusions: VNOTES is noninferior to LESS as a new minimal invasive procedure for hysterectomy, which also allows patients a faster recovery from surgery and to suffer less pain, and its efficiency and feasibility in large uterine need further exploring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.