Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978564›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022

Ramping activity in the striatum.

Adam Ponzi, Jeff Wickens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathological cell assembly dynamics in a striatal MSN network model.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam PonziInstitute of Biophysics, Italian National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Jeff WickensNeurobiology Research Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST), Okinawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of the timing of behavior is thought to require the basal ganglia (BG) and BG pathologies impair performance in timing tasks. Temporal interval discrimination depends on the ramping activity of medium spiny neurons (MSN) in the main BG input structure, the striatum, but the underlying mechanisms driving this activity are unclear. Here, we combine an MSN dynamical network model with an action selection system applied to an interval discrimination task. We find that when network parameters are appropriate for the striatum so that slowly fluctuating marginally stable dynamics are intrinsically generated, up and down ramping populations naturally emerge which enable significantly above chance task performance. We show that emergent population activity is in very good agreement with empirical studies and discuss how MSN network dysfunction in disease may alter temporal perception.

Indexed as

basal gangliacomputational modelinterval discriminationnetwork dynamicsneural rampingstriatumtemporal estimation

Identifiers

PMID35978564
PMCPMC9376361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.