Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978484›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2022

Recommendations for quantifying and reducing uncertainty in climate projections of species distributions.

Stephanie Brodie, James A Smith, Barbara A Muhling, Lewis A K Barnett, Gemma Carroll, Paul Fiedler, Steven J Bograd, Elliott L Hazen, Michael G Jacox, Kelly S Andrews and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Groundfish biodiversity change in northeastern Pacific waters under projected warming and deoxygenation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Stephanie BrodieInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0869-9939
James A SmithInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0496-3221
Barbara A MuhlingInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4555-6382
Lewis A K BarnettAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-8375
Gemma CarrollEnvironmental Defense Fund, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7776-0946
Paul FiedlerSouthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, San Diego, California, USA.
Steven J BogradInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-9932
Elliott L HazenInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-7178
Michael G JacoxInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3684-0717
Kelly S AndrewsNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-3800
Cheryl L BarnesCooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2650-5299
Lisa G CrozierNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-9525
Jerome FiechterOcean Sciences Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-2458
Alexa FredstonOcean Sciences Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5449-7054
Melissa A HaltuchNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2821-1267
Chris J HarveyNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9539-832X
Elizabeth HolmesNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-8393
Melissa A KarpECS Tech, in support of, NOAA Fisheries Office of Science and Technology, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2404-2937
Owen R LiuNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-3384
Michael J MalickNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8376-5476
Mercedes Pozo BuilInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-271X
Kate RichersonNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5414-2459
Christopher N RooperPacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2315-1269
Jameal SamhouriNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-3519
Rachel SearyInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7496-8792
Rebecca L SeldenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7956-5984
Andrew R ThompsonSouthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-2229
Desiree TommasiInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4027-6047
Eric J WardNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4359-0296
Isaac C KaplanNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-329X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Projecting the future distributions of commercially and ecologically important species has become a critical approach for ecosystem managers to strategically anticipate change, but large uncertainties in projections limit climate adaptation planning. Although distribution projections are primarily used to understand the scope of potential change-rather than accurately predict specific outcomes-it is nonetheless essential to understand where and why projections can give implausible results and to identify which processes contribute to uncertainty. Here, we use a series of simulated species distributions, an ensemble of 252 species distribution models, and an ensemble of three regional ocean climate projections, to isolate the influences of uncertainty from earth system model spread and from ecological modeling. The simulations encompass marine species with different functional traits and ecological preferences to more broadly address resource manager and fishery stakeholder needs, and provide a simulated true state with which to evaluate projections. We present our results relative to the degree of environmental extrapolation from historical conditions, which helps facilitate interpretation by ecological modelers working in diverse systems. We found uncertainty associated with species distribution models can exceed uncertainty generated from diverging earth system models (up to 70% of total uncertainty by 2100), and that this result was consistent across species traits. Species distribution model uncertainty increased through time and was primarily related to the degree to which models extrapolated into novel environmental conditions but moderated by how well models captured the underlying dynamics driving species distributions. The predictive power of simulated species distribution models remained relatively high in the first 30 years of projections, in alignment with the time period in which stakeholders make strategic decisions based on climate information. By understanding sources of uncertainty, and how they change at different forecast horizons, we provide recommendations for projecting species distribution models under global climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemFisheriesForecastingUncertaintyartificial intelligenceclimate changeearth system modelsextrapolationfisheriesmachine learningspecies distribution modelsvirtual species

Identifiers

PMID35978484
PMCPMC9805044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.