Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978405›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Acute effects of a motor coordination intervention on executive functions in kindergartners: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial.

Petra Haas, Gorden Sudeck, Augustin Kelava, Marcel Cattarius, Marie Meibohm, Johanna Schmid, Eirini Kistoglidou, Caterina Gawrilow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Petra HaasLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. petra.haas@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-2228
Gorden SudeckLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Augustin KelavaMethods Center, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Marcel CattariusResearch Group School Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Marie MeibohmResearch Group School Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Johanna SchmidLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Eirini KistoglidouResearch Group School Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Caterina GawrilowLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExecutive functions are pivotal for future academic and social functioning. Causal effects of physical activity on executive functions have been shown in adults. The primary objective of this study was to test the proof-of-concept (i.e., feasibility of implementation and acceptance) of a motor coordination intervention and a sedentary control condition in kindergartners and its preliminary effectiveness on subsequent executive function performance.

methodsThe study used a two-group post-test only design. All children aged between 4 and 7 years old were eligible. One hundred and three children (46% girls; age: M = 5.71 years, 95% CI = 5.50 to 5.92) recruited in a middle-sized town in Germany were randomly assigned to a 20-min motor coordination intervention (n = 51) or a sedentary control condition (n = 52), both of which were conducted in a one-on-one experimenter-child setting in the university or kindergarten. A second blinded-to-condition experimenter assessed the executive function outcomes directly following the conditions. Proof-of-concept criteria were the implementation of the intervention with a moderate-to-vigorous physical activity level assessed via heart rate sensors, and with motor coordination demands, analyzed via video recordings; children's acceptance via self-reported enjoyment of the conditions; and the post-assessments of executive functions with a behavioral and computerized task.

resultsThe motor coordination intervention and the control condition were feasible in a one-on-one setting with kindergartners. The intervention revealed heart rate increases and challenging motor coordination tasks. Children in both conditions indicated they enjoy them. Performance in the two executive function tasks did not differ between children in the motor coordination intervention and the control condition.

conclusionsA one-on-one experimenter-child setting was feasible to deliver in kindergartners. Future intervention studies should consider pre-testing of executive functions and take into account children's characteristics as potential moderators, such as motor coordination skills.

Indexed as

AcceptanceAcute physical activityExecutive functionsFeasibility of implementationKindergartnersMotor coordination interventionProof-of-concept

Identifiers

PMID35978405
PMCPMC9382724
OpenAlexW4292320071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.