Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978381›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2022

Competition-cooperation in the chemoautotrophic ecosystem of Movile Cave: first metagenomic approach on sediments.

Iulia Chiciudean, Giancarlo Russo, Diana Felicia Bogdan, Erika Andrea Levei, Luchiana Faur, Alexandra Hillebrand-Voiculescu, Oana Teodora Moldovan, Horia Leonard Banciu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Metagenome-assembled genomes from sugarcane mill mud.Microbiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Iulia ChiciudeanDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. iulia.chiciudean@ubbcluj.ro.
Giancarlo RussoEMBL Partner Institute for Genome Editing, Life Sciences Center-Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Diana Felicia BogdanDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Erika Andrea LeveiNational Institute for Research and Development for Optoelectronics, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation Subsidiary, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Luchiana FaurEmil Racovita Institute of Speleology, Geospeleology and Paleontology Department, Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandra Hillebrand-VoiculescuRomanian Institute of Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oana Teodora MoldovanRomanian Institute of Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Horia Leonard BanciuDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. horia.banciu@ubbcluj.ro.
Babeș-Bolyai University · RORomanian Institute of Science and Technology · ROEmil Racovita Institute of Speleology · ROResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation · ROVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMovile Cave (SE Romania) is a chemoautotrophically-based ecosystem fed by hydrogen sulfide-rich groundwater serving as a primary energy source analogous to the deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems. Our current understanding of Movile Cave microbiology has been confined to the sulfidic water and its proximity, as most studies focused on the water-floating microbial mat and planktonic accumulations likely acting as the primary production powerhouse of this unique subterranean ecosystem. By employing comprehensive genomic-resolved metagenomics, we questioned the spatial variation, chemoautotrophic abilities, ecological interactions and trophic roles of Movile Cave's microbiome thriving beyond the sulfidic-rich water.

resultsA customized bioinformatics pipeline led to the recovery of 106 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from 7 cave sediment metagenomes. Assemblies' taxonomy spanned 19 bacterial and three archaeal phyla with Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexota, Proteobacteria, Planctomycetota, Ca. Patescibacteria, Thermoproteota, Methylomirabilota, and Ca. Zixibacteria as prevalent phyla. Functional gene analyses predicted the presence of CO

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the primary production potential of Movile Cave expands way beyond its hydrothermal waters, enhancing our understanding of the functioning and ecological interactions within chemolithoautotrophically-based subterranean ecosystems.

Indexed as

ChemoautotrophicCompetition-cooperation interactionsCross-feeding dependenciesGenome-scale metabolic modelsRomaniaSulfidic cave

Identifiers

PMID35978381
PMCPMC9386943
OpenAlexW4292258852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.