Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978301›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Students' perceptions, engagement and satisfaction with the use of an e-rubric for the assessment of manual skills in physiotherapy.

Silvia Pérez-Guillén, Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren, Carlos López-de Celis, Vanessa González-Rueda, Pere R Rodríguez-Rubio, Sara Cabanillas-Barea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia Pérez-GuillénDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. sperezgu@uic.es.
Andoni Carrasco-UribarrenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos López-de CelisDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Vanessa González-RuedaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Pere R Rodríguez-RubioDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Sara Cabanillas-BareaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, formative assessment has gained importance in health care education to facilitate and enhance learning throughout the training period. Within the frame of active methodologies, rubrics have become an essential instrument for formative assessment. Most rubric-based assessment procedures focus on measuring the effects of rubrics on teachers. However, few studies focus their attention on the perception that students have of the evaluation process through rubrics.

methodsA cross-sectional survey study was carried out with 134 students enrolled in the pre-graduate Physiotherapy education. Assessment of manual skills during a practical examination was performed using an e-rubric tool. Peer-assessment, self-assessment and teacher´s assessment were registered. After completion of the examination process, students' perceptions, satisfaction and engagement were collected.

resultsQuantitative results related to students' opinion about e-rubric based assessment, students' engagement, perceived benefits and drawbacks of the e-rubric as well as the overall assessment of the learning experience were obtained. 86.6% of the students agreed upon the fact that "the rubric allowed one to know what it is expected from examination" and 83.6% of the students agreed upon the fact that "the rubric allowed one to verify the level of competence acquired". A high rate of agreement (87.3%) was also reached among students concerning feedback.

conclusionsE-rubrics seemed to have the potential to promote learning by making criteria and expectations explicit, facilitating feedback, self-assessment and peer-assessment. The importance of students in their own learning process required their participation in the assessment task, a fact that was globally appreciated by the students. Learning experience was considered interesting, motivating, it promoted participation, cooperative work and peer-assessment. The use of e-rubrics increased engagement levels when attention was focused on their guidance and reflection role.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPersonal SatisfactionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesStudentsE-rubricFormative assessmentPhysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35978301
PMCPMC9382838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.