Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978286›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2022

Safety and tolerability of erenumab in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine across age groups: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

Christian Lampl, Viktoria Kraus, Katrina Lehner, Brett Loop, Mahan Chehrenama, Zofia Maczynska, Shannon Ritter, Jan Klatt, Josefin Snellman

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02066415 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Chronic Migraine Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2014 to 2016Enrolled667ConditionsTreatment for Prevention of Chronic MigraineArmsErenumab, Placebo
NCT02456740 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Migraine Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled955ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab, Placebo
NCT02483585 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Migraine Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled577ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab, Placebo
NCT03096834 phase3completednot on this map

A 12-week Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once Monthly Subcutaneous 140 mg AMG 334 Against Placebo in Adult Episodic Migraine Patients Who Have Failed 2-4 Prophylactic Treatments (LIBERTY)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2017 to 2021Enrolled246ConditionsEpisodic MigraineArmsAMG334 (70 mg) Pre-Filled Syringe (PFS), Placebo Pre-Filled Syringe (PFS)
NCT03333109 phase3completednot on this map

A 12-week Double-blind, Randomized, Multi-center Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once Monthly Subcutaneous AMG 334 Against Placebo in Adult Episodic Migraine Patients (EMPOwER)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2018 to 2020Enrolled900ConditionsEpisodic MigraineArmsErenumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Headache After Stroke: An Update for the Clinician.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christian LamplDepartment of Neurology, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Seilerstätte 2, 4020, Linz, Austria. Christian.Lampl@bblinz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-1181
Viktoria KrausDepartment of Neurology, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Seilerstätte 2, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Katrina LehnerDepartment of Neurology, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Seilerstätte 2, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Brett LoopNovartis Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mahan ChehrenamaAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Zofia MaczynskaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Shannon RitterNovartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Jan KlattMerck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Josefin SnellmanNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Convent Hospital of the Brothers of Saint John of God · ATNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USAmgen (United States) · USMerck (Germany) · DE

Funding

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. There exists an unmet need to establish the safety of erenumab in older individuals, in view of existing multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes. This pooled analysis of five large migraine-prevention studies examined the safety of erenumab stratified across age groups, particularly in older populations.

methodsPooled and age-stratified analysis of safety data from the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of five randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 and 3 studies of erenumab in participants with episodic or chronic migraine across the age groups < 40 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years, and ≥ 60 years was completed. The safety of erenumab across age groups was determined by assessing safety endpoints including treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and events leading to study drug discontinuation.

resultsOverall, 3345 participants across five studies were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 1359), erenumab 70 mg (n = 1132) or erenumab 140 mg (n = 854); 3176 (94.9%) completed the DBTP, and 169 (5.1%) discontinued, mainly due to participant decision (110; 3.3%). Overall, 1349 (40.6%), 1122 (33.8%), and 850 (25.6%) participants received at least one dose of placebo, erenumab 70 mg, and erenumab 140 mg, respectively. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was similar across all age groups for both doses of erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) and placebo (< 40 years, 44.0% vs 44.4%; 40-49 years, 42.5% vs 49.2%; 50-59 years, 46.5% vs 41.6%; ≥ 60 years, 43.8% vs 59.4%). Incidence of treatment-emergent serious AEs overall, and stratified by age groups for both doses and placebo was low (< 40 years, 0.9% vs 1.2%; 40-49 years, 1.7% vs 1.9%; and 50-59 years, 1.6% vs 1.1%), with no serious AEs reported in participants aged ≥ 60 years. No deaths were reported.

conclusionsErenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) exhibited a similar safety profile compared with placebo across age groups in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine, with no increased emergence of events due to age. Erenumab was well tolerated in older participants with multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02066415, NCT02456740, NCT02483585, NCT03096834, NCT03333109.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAdvanced ageCalcitonin gene-related peptideCardiovascularCerebrovascularErenumabGastrointestinalMonoclonal antibodyOlder individualsRandomized controlled trialSafetyTolerability

Identifiers

PMID35978286
PMCPMC9386939
OpenAlexW4292425643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.