Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978174›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2022

Initiative on Superselective Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Results (INSPIRE).

Thierry de Baere, Maxime Ronot, Jin Wook Chung, Rita Golfieri, Roman Kloeckner, Joong-Won Park, Bernhard Gebauer, Nabil Kibriya, Ganapathy Ananthakrishnan, Shiro Miyayama

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Role and Techniques.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Thierry de BaereInstitut Gustave Roussy, Service Radiodiagnostic et Imagerie Médicale, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France. Thierry.DEBAERE@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4556-7663
Maxime RonotDepartment of Medical Imaging, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France.
Jin Wook ChungDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Rita GolfieriUnità Operativa Radiologia Universitaria (Pad 1, 2), Dipartimento delle Radiologie, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Roman KloecknerRadiology Department, Mainz University: Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Joong-Won ParkCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center (NCC), Goyang-si, South Korea.
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum: Charite, Berlin, Germany.
Nabil KibriyaDepartment of Radiology, Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ganapathy AnanthakrishnanDepartment of Radiology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Shiro MiyayamaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Fukui-Ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital · JPHôpital Beaujon · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBNational Cancer Center · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several publications show that superselective conventional TransArterial ChemoEmbolization (cTACE), meaning cTACE performed selectively with a microcatheter positioned as close as possible to the tumor, improves outcomes, maximizing the anti-tumoral effect and minimizing the collateral damages of the surrounding liver parenchyma. Recent recommendations coming from the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) highlighted that TACE must be used in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) "selectively targetable" and "accessible to supraselective catheterization." The goal of the manuscript is to better define such population and to standardize superselective cTACE (ss-cTACE) technique. An expert panel with extensive clinical-procedural experience in TACE, have come together in a virtual meeting to generate recommendations and express their consensus. Experts recommend that anytime cTACE is proposed, it should be ss-cTACE, preferably with a 1.5-2.0 Fr microcatheter. Ideally, ss-cTACE should be proposed to patients with less than five lesions and a maximum number of two segments involved, with largest tumor smaller than 5 cm. Angio Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) should be used to detect enhancing tumors, tumor feeders and guide tumor targeting. Whole tumor volume should be covered to obtain the best response. Adding peritumoral margins is encouraged but not mandatory. The treatment should involve a water-in-oil emulsion, whose quality is assessable with the "drop test." Additional particulate embolization should be systematically performed, as per definition of cTACE procedure. Non-contrast CBCT or Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) combined with angiography has been considered the gold standard for imaging during TACE, and should be used to assess tumor coverage during the procedure. Experts convene that superselectivity decreases incidence of adverse effects and improves tolerance. Experts recommend contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) as initial imaging on first follow-up after ss-cTACE, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) if remaining tumor viability cannot be confidently assessed on CT. If no response is obtained after two ss-cTACE sessions within six months, patient must be considered unsuitable for TACE and proposed for alternative therapy. Patients are best served by multidisciplinary decision-making, and Interventional Radiologists should take an active role in patient selection, treatment allocation, and post-procedural care.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsEmulsionsEthiodized OilHumansRetrospective StudiesWaterEmulsionsEthiodized OilWaterConventional transarterial chemoembolizationHepatocellular carcinomaIodized oilSelective embolization

Identifiers

PMID35978174
PMCPMC9499883
OpenAlexW4292342928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.