ArticlePsychological research2023
Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: a multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs.
Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term action-effect bindings encode perceptual transitions rather than perceptual end-states.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- From exemplars to categories: generalization of action-effect learning in a free-choice task.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Moving beyond discrete categories in motor cognition.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Learning and transfer of response-effect relations.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- An attempt to replicate action-effect learning and its generalization without stimulus-stimulus learning.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Exogenously Driven Neural Reactivation of Spatially Matching Visual Working-Memory Contents.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Guiding gaze via gaze: Effect anticipation during intentional saccadic gaze leading.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Repeating Task-Irrelevant Contexts Does Not Bias Task Choice and Performance in Voluntary Task Switching.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
- The effect of preparation on binding between spatial and non-spatial features of voices in a multitalker setting.Psychological research · 2025Article
- C-SMB 2.0: Integrating over 25 years of motor sequencing research with the Discrete Sequence Production task.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Generalisation of unpredictable action-effect features: Large individual differences with little on-average effect.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.Psychological research · 2024Review
- Opposing influences of global and local stimulus-hand proximity on crosstalk interference in dual tasks.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- A tutorial on using the paired t test for power calculations in repeated measures ANOVA with interactions.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Is there hierarchical generalization in response-effect learning?Experimental brain research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC) has influenced research on action and perception across the past two decades. It integrates several seminal empirical phenomena and it has continued to stimulate novel experimental approaches on the representational foundations of action control and perceptual experience. Yet, many of the most notable results surrounding TEC originate from an era of psychological research that relied on rather small sample sizes as judged by today's standards. This state hampers future research aiming to build on previous phenomena. We, therefore, provide a multi-lab re-assessment of the following six classical observations: response-effect compatibility, action-induced blindness, response-effect learning, stimulus-response binding, code occupation, and short-term response-effect binding. Our major goal is to provide precise estimates of corresponding effect sizes to facilitate future scientific endeavors. These effect sizes turned out to be considerably smaller than in the original reports, thus allowing for informed decisions on how to address each phenomenon in future work. Of note, the most relevant results of the original observations were consistently obtained in the present experiments as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.