Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978160›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Impact of restricted visitation policies during COVID-19 on critically ill adults, their families, critical care clinicians, and decision-makers: a qualitative interview study.

Kirsten M Fiest, Karla D Krewulak, Natalia Jaworska, Krista L Spence, Sara J Mizen, Sean M Bagshaw, Karen E A Burns, Deborah J Cook, Robert A Fowler, Kendiss Olafson and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. kmfiest@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-6594
Karla D KrewulakDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Natalia JaworskaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Krista L SpenceDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sara J MizenFaculty of Health, School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sean M BagshawDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Karen E A BurnsLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Deborah J CookDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Robert A FowlerInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kendiss OlafsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Scott B PattenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Oleksa G RewaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sean SpenceDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Andrew WestCanadian Society of Respiratory Therapists, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jeanna Parsons LeighFaculty of Health, School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Alberta Health Services · CADalhousie University · CAImpact · CAMcMaster University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, restricted visitation policies were enacted at acute care facilities to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and conserve personal protective equipment. In this study, we aimed to describe the impact of restricted visitation policies on critically ill patients, families, critical care clinicians, and decision-makers; highlight the challenges faced in translating these policies into practice; and delineate strategies to mitigate their effects.

methodA qualitative description design was used. We conducted semistructured interviews with critically ill adult patients and their family members, critical care clinicians, and decision-makers (i.e., policy makers or enforcers) affected by restricted visitation policies. We transcribed semistructured interviews verbatim and analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThree patients, eight family members, 30 clinicians (13 physicians, 17 nurses from 23 Canadian intensive care units [ICUs]), and three decision-makers participated in interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify five themes: 1) acceptance of restricted visitation (e.g., accepting with concerns); 2) impact of restricted visitation (e.g., ethical challenges, moral distress, patients dying alone, intensified workload); 3) trust in the healthcare system during the pandemic (e.g., mistrust of clinical team); 4) modes of communication (e.g., communication using virtual platforms); and 5) impact of policy implementation on clinical practice (e.g., frequent changes and inconsistent implementation).

conclusionsRestricted visitation policies across ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected critically ill patients and their families, critical care clinicians, and decision-makers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessAdultCanadaCritical CareDecision MakingFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsPolicyQualitative ResearchCOVID-19intensive care unitpolicyvisiting policies

Identifiers

PMID35978160
PMCPMC9385091
OpenAlexW4292265445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.