Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Classifying grains using behaviour-informed machine learning.

Sudip Laudari, Benjy Marks, Pierre Rognon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sudip LaudariParticles and Grains Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Benjy MarksParticles and Grains Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Pierre RognonParticles and Grains Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. pierre.rognon@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorting granular materials such as ores, coffee beans, cereals, gravels and pills is essential for applications in mineral processing, agriculture and waste recycling. Existing sorting methods are based on the detection of contrast in grain properties including size, colour, density and chemical composition. However, many grain properties cannot be directly detected in-situ, which significantly impairs sorting efficacy. We show here that a simple neural network can infer contrast in a wide range of grain properties by detecting patterns in their observable kinematics. These properties include grain size, density, stiffness, friction, dissipation and adhesion. This method of classification based on behaviour can significantly widen the range of granular materials that can be sorted. It can similarly be applied to enhance the sorting of other particulate materials including cells and droplets in microfluidic devices.

Indexed as

Edible GrainRecyclingAgricultureMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35978089
PMCPMC9385656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.