Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978077›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and risk factors for recovery of intrauterine Escherichia coli from cows with metritis on California commercial dairy farms.

Carl Basbas, Adriana Garzon, Noelia Silva-Del-Rio, Barbara A Byrne, Betsy Karle, Sharif S Aly, John D Champagne, Deniece R Williams, Fabio S Lima, Vinicius S Machado and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of biofilm and exopolysaccharide production in Bacillus strains isolated from the bovine uterus.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carl BasbasDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Adriana GarzonDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Noelia Silva-Del-RioDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Barbara A ByrneDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, USA.
Betsy KarleCooperative Extension, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Orland, CA, USA.
Sharif S AlyDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
John D ChampagneVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Deniece R WilliamsVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Fabio S LimaDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Vinicius S MachadoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Richard V PereiraDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. rvpereira@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of this study were to evaluate factors affecting recovery and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in intrauterine E. coli in post-partum dairy cows with and without metritis from commercial California dairy farms. Using a cross-sectional study design, a total of 307 cows were sampled from 25 farms throughout California, from which a total of 162 intrauterine E. coli isolates were recovered. During farm visits, cows within 21 days post-partum were categorized in one of three clinical presentation groups before enrollment: metritis (MET, n = 86), defined as a cow with watery, red or brown colored, and fetid vaginal discharge; cows with purulent discharge (PUS, n = 106), defined as a non-fetid purulent or mucopurulent vaginal discharge; and control cows, (CTL, n = 115) defined as cows with either no vaginal discharge or a clear, non-purulent mucus vaginal discharge. Cows diagnosed as MET had significantly higher odds for recovery of E. coli compared to cows diagnosed as CTL (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.96), with no significant difference observed between PUS and CTL, and PUS and MET. An increase in days in milk (DIM) at the time of sampling was significantly associated with a decrease in the odds ratio for E. coli recovery from intrauterine swabs (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98). All intrauterine E. coli were resistant to ampicillin (AMP), with an AMR prevalence of 30.2% and 33.9% observed for chlortetracycline and oxytetracycline, respectively. Only 8.6% of isolates were resistant to ceftiofur (CEFT), one of the most common drugs used to treat cows on farms sampled. No significant difference in the prevalence of AMR was observed among clinical groups at the individual cow level. At the farm level, a significantly higher odds for isolating intrauterine E. coli resistant to chlortetracycline (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 3.7-58.0) or oxytetracycline (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.4-33.8) was observed at farms that used an intrauterine infusion of oxytetracycline as a treatment for metritis when compared to those farms that did not use this practice. Findings from this study indicate the need for further research supporting a broader understanding of farm practices driving AMR in cows with metritis, as well as data to increase the accuracy of breakpoints for AMR classification of intrauterine E. coli from cattle.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesChlortetracyclineEndometritisEscherichia coli InfectionsOxytetracyclinePelvic Inflammatory DiseaseAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFarmsFemaleHumansRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlortetracyclineOxytetracycline

Identifiers

PMID35978077
PMCPMC9386028
OpenAlexW4292324113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.