Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35978031›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Breast cancer patient characterisation and visualisation using deep learning and fisher information networks.

Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Patrick Riley, Ivan Olier, Renata G Raidou, Raul Casana-Eslava, Marc Rea, Li Shen, Paulo J G Lisboa, Carlo Palmieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sandra Ortega-MartorellSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. s.ortegamartorell@ljmu.ac.uk.
Patrick RileySchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Ivan OlierSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Renata G RaidouInstitute of Visual Computing & Human-Centred Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Raul Casana-EslavaDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Marc ReaThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Li ShenDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Paulo J G LisboaSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Carlo PalmieriInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed female malignancy globally, with better survival rates if diagnosed early. Mammography is the gold standard in screening programmes for breast cancer, but despite technological advances, high error rates are still reported. Machine learning techniques, and in particular deep learning (DL), have been successfully used for breast cancer detection and classification. However, the added complexity that makes DL models so successful reduces their ability to explain which features are relevant to the model, or whether the model is biased. The main aim of this study is to propose a novel visualisation to help characterise breast cancer patients using Fisher Information Networks on features extracted from mammograms using a DL model. In the proposed visualisation, patients are mapped out according to their similarities and can be used to study new patients as a 'patient-like-me' approach. When applied to the CBIS-DDSM dataset, it was shown that it is a competitive methodology that can (i) facilitate the analysis and decision-making process in breast cancer diagnosis with the assistance of the FIN visualisations and 'patient-like-me' analysis, and (ii) help improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce overdiagnosis by identifying the most likely diagnosis based on clinical similarities with neighbouring patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningBreastFemaleHumansInformation ServicesMammography

Identifiers

PMID35978031
PMCPMC9385866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.