Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977954›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Intrinsic cell rheology drives junction maturation.

K Sri-Ranjan, J L Sanchez-Alonso, P Swiatlowska, S Rothery, P Novak, S Gerlach, D Koeninger, B Hoffmann, R Merkel, M M Stevens and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Mechanics of cell-cell junctions.Biophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

K Sri-Ranjan *National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J L Sanchez-Alonso *National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-0079
P SwiatlowskaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
S RotheryNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
P NovakSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-0344
S GerlachInstitute of Biological Information Processing, IBI-2: Mechanobiology, Julich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8051-329X
D KoeningerInstitute of Biological Information Processing, IBI-2: Mechanobiology, Julich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-8218
B HoffmannInstitute of Biological Information Processing, IBI-2: Mechanobiology, Julich, Germany.
R MerkelInstitute of Biological Information Processing, IBI-2: Mechanobiology, Julich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3178-3282
M M StevensDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-266X
S X SunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Institute of NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-7088
J GorelikNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.gorelik@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-9158
Vania M M BragaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. v.braga@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-7163
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEImperial College London · GBLung Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D019400/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M022617/1British Heart Foundation RE/08/002/23906British Heart Foundation RG/12/18/30088British Heart Foundation RG/17/13/33173British Heart Foundation RM/13/1/30157Medical Research Council MR/J007668/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098411/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental property of higher eukaryotes that underpins their evolutionary success is stable cell-cell cohesion. Yet, how intrinsic cell rheology and stiffness contributes to junction stabilization and maturation is poorly understood. We demonstrate that localized modulation of cell rheology governs the transition of a slack, undulated cell-cell contact (weak adhesion) to a mature, straight junction (optimal adhesion). Cell pairs confined on different geometries have heterogeneous elasticity maps and control their own intrinsic rheology co-ordinately. More compliant cell pairs grown on circles have slack contacts, while stiffer triangular cell pairs favour straight junctions with flanking contractile thin bundles. Counter-intuitively, straighter cell-cell contacts have reduced receptor density and less dynamic junctional actin, suggesting an unusual adaptive mechano-response to stabilize cell-cell adhesion. Our modelling informs that slack junctions arise from failure of circular cell pairs to increase their own intrinsic stiffness and resist the pressures from the neighbouring cell. The inability to form a straight junction can be reversed by increasing mechanical stress artificially on stiffer substrates. Our data inform on the minimal intrinsic rheology to generate a mature junction and provide a springboard towards understanding elements governing tissue-level mechanics.

Indexed as

ActinsCell AdhesionElasticityRheologyStress, MechanicalActins

Identifiers

PMID35977954
PMCPMC9385638
OpenAlexW4292099598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.