Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977318›Full record

Observational studyJAMA health forum2022

Turnover in Zero-Premium Status Among Health Insurance Marketplace Plans Available to Low-Income Enrollees.

Edward Kong, Mark Shepard, Adrianna McIntyre

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Erratum: Error in Figure 1.JAMA health forum · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward KongHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark ShepardHarvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Adrianna McIntyreHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
MD-PhD Training Program in Aging and the Social/Behavioral SciencesT32AG051108 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MCWILLIAMS, JOHN MICHAEL · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
Work Requirements and Health Care Disparities in Medicaid: A RandomizedControlled TrialR01MD014970 · NIMHD · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LAYTON, TIMOTHY · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG051108NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD014970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recent subsidy enhancements in Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces made many low-income enrolles (below 150% of the federal poverty level [FPL]) eligible for 2 free silver-tier plans. eligible for 2 free silver-tier plans. However, an unintended consequence of this structure is that the identity of which silver plans are free will often "turn over" between years, requiring that enrollees actively initiate premium payment (or lose coverage). The prevalence of this free-plan turnover is not known. Objective: To measure the prevalence of free-plan turnover in ACA Marketplaces and to estimate how many enrollees below 150% of FPL are likely to be affected. Design Setting and Participants: This observational cross-sectional study used data on plan offerings and premiums in 33 state ACA Marketplaces using HealthCare.gov in 2021 and 2022, along with estimates of county-level enrollee characteristics and plan selection patterns. The enrollment-weighted share of county markets affected by free-plan turnover was quantified, along with the association of turnover with enrollee and market characteristics. Estimates of the number of affected low-income enrollees were calculated using the data plus statistics reported in past research. Data were analyzed from November 21, 2021, to February 28, 2022. Results: This study found that turnover of zero-premium plans was quite common, with 93% of HealthCare.gov counties (weighted by enrollment) experiencing at least 1 zero-premium plan in 2021 turning over to nonfree in 2022; 84% of counties experienced turnover of all $0 silver plans from 2021 to 2022. This turnover affected an estimated 1.36 million people with incomes below 150% of FPL. Turnover was more common in counties with a higher share of non-White enrollees, in Medicaid nonexpansion states, in counties with more carriers, and in counties with changes in the number of offered plans. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that owing to the prevalence of zero-premium plan turnover, many low-income ACA enrollees faced elevated risk of disenrollment at the start of 2022. Outreach to affected enrollees and other actions to encourage coverage retention and midyear reenrollment could help mitigate coverage losses.

Indexed as

Health Insurance ExchangesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInsurance, HealthPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35977318
PMCPMC9034407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.