Observational studyJAMA health forum2022
Tracking Turnover Among Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study.
Observational study in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rural and Urban Differences in the Trends in Supply of Home Care Workers From 2015 to 2024.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- Reimagining Hospital Medicine for Long-Term Sustainability.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Developing a Toolkit to Support Dissemination and Implementation of the Red Carpet Entry Program.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Nurses' Transitions Into and Out of the Home Health Sector.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2026Article
- Towards equity in healthcare workforce well-being: a framework for leaders to improve well-being and retention.BMJ leader · 2026Article
- Telehealth and the work behavior of mental health clinicians.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Intentions and actions towards leaving healthcare work since COVID-19: group-based trajectory analyses in the UK-REACH cohort.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2026Article
- Recent trends in US government healthcare & behavioral health workforce departures.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- The Face of Crisis: Examining Factors Affecting Nurses' Professional Values During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- New Opportunities or More of the Same? Health Industry Entrants in the Post-Pandemic Era.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2025Article
- Public health nurse density and associated factors across Japan: an ecological study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- From Nursing Homes to Home Care: Examining the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Direct Care Worker Transitions.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025Article
- Methods and lessons from conducting a national study of primary care nurse practitioners.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2025Article
- Beyond the pandemic: the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and healthcare worker shortages in the United States.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Experiences in a Clinical Innovation Pharmacy Fellowship: A Novel Model of Ambulatory Care Training and Practice Advancement.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Trends in Screening for Social Risk in US Physician Practices.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Impact of federal funding for graduate medical education on residency program size: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act.PloS one · 2025Article
- "They seemed to forget about us little people": the lived experiences of personal care attendants during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- 'How are we going to harm the next trauma patient?' Trauma care providers' perspective on potential harm to trauma patients.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Economic insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers by educational attainment.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The health care sector lost millions of workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and job recovery has been slow, particularly in long-term care. Objective: To identify which health care workers were at highest risk of exiting the health care workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design Setting and Participants: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted among individuals employed full-time in health care jobs from 2019 to 2021 in the US. Using the data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), we compared turnover rates before the pandemic (preperiod, January 2019-March 2020; 71 843 observations from CPS) with the first 9 months (postperiod 1, April 2020-December 2020; 38 556 observations) and latter 8 months of the pandemic (postperiod 2, January 2021-October 2021; 44 389 observations). Main Outcomes and Measures: Health care workforce exits (also referred to as turnover) defined as a health care worker's response to the CPS as being unemployed or out of the labor force in a month subsequent to a month when they reported being actively employed in the health care workforce. The probability of exiting the health care workforce was estimated using a logistic regression model controlling for health care occupation, health care setting, being female, having a child younger than 5 years old in the household, race and ethnicity, age and age squared, citizenship status, being married, having less than a bachelor's degree, living in a metropolitan area, identifier for those reporting employment status at the first peak of COVID-19, and select interaction terms with time periods (postperiods 1 and 2). Data analyses were conducted from March 1, 2021, to January 31, 2022. Results: The study population comprised 125 717 unique health care workers with a mean (SD) age of 42.3 (12.1) years; 96 802 (77.0%) were women; 84 733 (67.4%) were White individuals. Estimated health care turnover rates peaked in postperiod 1, but largely recovered by postperiod 2, except for among long-term care workers and physicians. We found a 4-fold difference in turnover rates between physicians and health aides or assistants. Rates were also higher for health workers with young children (<5 years), for both sexes and highest among women. By race and ethnicity, persistently higher turnover rates were found among American Indian/Alaska Native/Pacific Islander workers; White workers had persistently lower rates; and Black and Latino workers experienced the slowest job recovery rates. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this observational cross-sectional study suggest that although much of the health care workforce is on track to recover to prepandemic turnover rates, these rates have been persistently high and slow to recover among long-term care workers, health aides and assistants, workers of minoritized racial and ethnic groups, and women with young children. Given the high demand for long-term care workers, targeted attention is needed to recruit job-seeking health care workers and to retain those currently in these jobs to lessen turnover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.