Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977300›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2021

Geographic Variation in Medicare Fee-for-Service Health Care Expenditures Before and After the Passage of the Affordable Care Act.

Neeraj Sood, Zhiyou Yang, Peter Huckfeldt, José Escarce, Ioana Popescu, Teryl Nuckols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Hospitalizations Among Older Adults With Co-Presence of Cancer and Dementia in US Counties: 2013-2018.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neeraj SoodSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Zhiyou YangHealth Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Peter HuckfeldtDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
José EscarceDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Ioana PopescuDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Teryl NuckolsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS025394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Geographic variation in Medicare spending is often used as a measure of wasteful spending. A 2013 Institute of Medicine report found that postacute care was a key contributor of geographic variation from 2007 to 2009. However, payment reforms and antifraud efforts implemented after the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may have reduced geographic variation in spending, especially postacute care spending. Objective: To investigate how geographic variation in Medicare fee-for-service per-beneficiary spending changed from 2007 to 2018 before and after passage of the ACA. Design Setting and Participants: This cross-sectional study included all fee-for-service Medicare enrollees 65 years or older from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018. The fee-for-service Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File was used to group hospital referral regions (HRRs) in each year into deciles (10 equal groups) based on per-beneficiary total spending. The difference between the per-beneficiary monthly spending in each decile and the national mean, as well as the ratio of per-beneficiary total spending in the top deciles to that of the bottom decile, were reported. Data analysis occurred from July 22, 2019, to October 21, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Per-beneficiary spending on hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician, and postacute care (and type of postacute care). Results: There were 27.2 million fee-for-service beneficiaries in 2007 (58.0% women) and 28.3 million beneficiaries in 2018 (55.9% women). Per-beneficiary Medicare spending was $9691 in 2007 and $9847 in 2018 (using inflation-adjusted 2018 dollars). Geographic variation in Medicare spending was stable from 2007 to 2011 and then declined steadily from 2012 to 2018. The ratio of per-beneficiary total Medicare spending in the HRRs in the top decile to the bottom decile was 1.68 in 2007 ($415 monthly difference in spending) but only 1.56 ($361 monthly difference in spending) in 2018 (estimated change, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.21 to -0.02]; Conclusions and Relevance: Geographic variation in total per-beneficiary Medicare spending fell from 2007 to 2018, with home health spending being a key factor associated with geographic variation. The ACA's value-based payment programs and enhanced integrity efforts in home health provide a possible explanation for the decrease.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresMedicareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMalePatient Protection and Affordable Care ActUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35977300
PMCPMC8796890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.